Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Generes v. Bowie Lumber Co., 79 So. 413.

19 citing documents.

Succession of Campbell 243 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Trahan v. Broussard 206 So. 2d 82 La. 1968
These authorities, viz., , 79 So.
Giroir v. Dumesnil 184 So. 2d 1 La. 1966
Succession of Lapene 96 So. 2d 321 La. 1957
103 , , to the effect that: “ * * * it seems manifest that a trespasser, or one holding land or other succession property without semblance of right or title, as in Generes v. Bowie Lumber Co. [ , 79 So.
Penfield v. Sowel 85 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
In view of the foregoing codal provisions, this court was constrained, in interpreting article 1030, to say, , 79 So.
Finley v. Morgan 80 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Rodriguez v. Shroder 77 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Lee v. Jones 69 So. 2d 26 La. 1953
We are now referred to the following cases: , 79 So.
Sun Oil Co. v. Tarver 52 So. 2d 437 La. 1951
Dileo v. Dileo 46 So. 2d 53 La. 1950
Articles 940, 941, Civil Code; , 79 So.
Labarre v. Rateau 26 So. 2d 279 La. 1946
Buckley v. Catlett 13 So. 2d 384 La. 1943
In Re Gray's Succession 9 So. 2d 481 La. 1942
Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
Succession of Tyson 172 So. 772 La. 1937
Gahn v. Brown 107 So. 576 La. 1925
Dew v. Hammett 91 So. 523 La. 1922
'In view of the foregoing codal provisions, this court was constrained, in interpreting article 1030, to say, , 79 South.
Bendernagel v. Foret 81 So. 869 La. 1919
el urge with much earnestness and ability their plea of prescription of 30 years, based upon article 1030 of the Civil Code, viz.: “The faculty of accepting or renouncing a ■succession becomes barred by the lapse of time required for the longest prescription of the rights to immovables.” , 79 South.
Harang v. Bowie Lumber Co. 81 So. 769 La. 1919
A majority of the members of the court expressed that opinion, , 79 South.