Richard v. American Insurance Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 3, 1925 1 La. App. 597
Richard v. American Insurance Co., 212 So. 2d 484 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968).
Cited by
- Courville v. B & B Engineering & Supply Co. 230 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Carlisle v. Employers Mutuals of Wausau 220 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Harney v. Kountz 218 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
- Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 215 So. 2d 122 La. 1968
- Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. 215 So. 2d 125 La. 1968
- Dupuy v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 215 So. 2d 123 La. 1968
- Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 212 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- American Insurance Co. v. Richard 212 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Richard v. American Insurance Co. 212 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 212 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Richard v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 212 So. 2d 471
- American Insurance Co. v. Richard 212 So. 2d 481
- Richard v. American Insurance Co. 212 So. 2d 483
Opinion text
HOOD, Judge. Plaintiff, Mrs. Felicia Arnaud Richard, instituted this suit for damages for personal injuries sustained by her as the result of an accident which occurred on August 18, 1965. The defendants are Richard H. Boehmer, C. H. Boehmer Sales Agency and The American Insurance Company. Judgment on the merits was rendered by the trial court in favor of defendants, rejecting plaintiff’s demands. The costs of this suit, except for the expense of receiving and transcribing the evidence, were assessed to plaintiff, the cost of the transcript of evidence having been assessed as costs in a companion suit. Plaintiff has appealed. This is a companion to three other suits which arose out of the same accident. All of these suits were consolidated for the purpose of trial and appeal, and all are being decided by us on this date. See Richard et al. v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company et al., La.App., 212 So.2d 471 ; American Insurance Company v. Richard et al., La.App., 212 So.2d 481 ; Richard et al. v. American Insurance Company et al., La.App., 212 So.2d 483 . For the reasons which we assigned in the companion case of Richard et al. v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant. Affirmed. On Application for Rehearing. En Banc. Rehearing denied.