Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Fath, 80 So. 659.
- In Re Succession of Haydel 780 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- Succession of Russell 590 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Succession of Jones 377 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
- Succession of Waterman 298 So. 2d 731 La. 1974
- Succession of Barry 196 So. 2d 265 La. 1967
- Succession of Jones 172 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
- Oroszy v. Burkard 158 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
- Succession of Formby 127 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Succession of Elliott 111 So. 2d 344 La. 1959
- Succession of Kamlade 94 So. 2d 257 La. 1957
-
Succession of Jan
78 So. 2d 241
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Both counsel rely on the well-established rule which appears as syllabus No. 4 in , 80 So.
- Succession of Lambert 28 So. 2d 1 La. 1946
- Succession of Price 13 So. 2d 240 La. 1943
- Jordan v. Filmore 120 So. 275 La. 1929
- Succession of Maltry 109 So. 827 La. 1926