Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Littlefield v. City of Shreveport, 87 So. 714.

19 citing documents.

Aucoin v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 450 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Corsey v. State, Through Dept. of Corrections 375 So. 2d 1319 La. 1979
Jackson v. Zito 314 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
175 , it was said that those who claim exemption from prescription by reason of ignorance resulting from fraud must allege and show that such ignorance was neither willful nor negligent; and again, , 87 So.
Majesty v. Comet-Mercury-Ford Co. of Lorain, Mich. 296 So. 2d 271 La. 1974
Cyr v. Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corporation 273 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
However, the type of concealment giving rise to application of the doctrine of "Contra *698 non Valentem" , 87 So.
Lassere v. Lassere 255 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Dagenhart v. Robertson Truck Lines, Inc. 230 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
175 , it was said that those who claim exemption from prescription by reason of ignorance resulting from fraud must allege and show that such ignorance was neither willful nor negligent; and again, , 87 So.
Muhoberac v. Saloon, Inc. 210 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
itional obligation to pay, coupled with an indication of a particular fund to be applied to reduction of the debt (the agreement in this case) is exactly the same distinction made by the Negotiable Instruments Act between “an order * * * to pay out of a particular fund” and “an indication of a particular fund out of which reimbursement is to be made * * *.” *575 , 87 So.
Aegis Insurance Co. v. Delta Fire & Casualty Co. 99 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Ayres v. New York Life Ins. Co. 54 So. 2d 409 La. 1951
Pope v. Employers Liability Assur. Corporation 14 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1943
Morrissey v. Police Jury of Vermilion Parish 13 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1943
Smith v. Tyson 192 So. 61 La. 1939
175 , it was said that those who claim exemption from prescription by reason of ignorance resulting from fraud must allege and show that such ignorance was neither willful nor negligent; *679 and again, , 87 So.
Kennard v. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. 190 So. 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Cruze v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia 185 So. 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
117 , it appeared that the debtors had been guilty of active concealment and it is likewise so that, , 87 So.
Cruze v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia 184 So. 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Succession of Kretzer 170 So. 906 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Succession of Hunzelman 157 So. 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
691 , ; Succession of Anderson (La.
Porter v. Town of v. Lle Platte 104 So. 67 La. 1925