Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Co., 89 So. 688.
- Lejano v. Bandak 705 So. 2d 158 La. 1998
- Lulich v. Robin 466 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
- Campo v. LaNasa 173 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
-
Cannon v. Hunt
165 So. 2d 523
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
846 .’ “Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Co., Ltd., , 89 So.
-
Walker v. Jim Austin Motor Company
162 So. 2d 135
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
"The following excerpt from Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Co., Ltd., , 89 So.
- Evangeline Refining Co. v. Nunez 153 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
- Price v. Taylor 139 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
Carter Oil Company v. King
134 So. 2d 89
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
The foregoing principle has been cited with approval in Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Company, Ltd., 1921, , 89 So.
-
Cockerham v. Aime
110 So. 2d 238
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
The following excerpt from Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Co., Ltd., , 89 So.
-
Elysian Homes, Inc. v. Davis
90 So. 2d 791
La. 1956
* * * even contracts unambiguous on their face on clear proof that, through fraud or error, the written instrument has been made to express a different purpose from that which the parties had agreed on and had intended to embody therein; but to support relief there must be clear proof of the antecedent contract and of the error in committing it to writing.’ ” Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Co., Ltd., , 89 *101 So.
-
CARDOS EX REL. CARDOS v. Cristadoro
84 So. 2d 606
La. 1955
215 , , this court in quoting from an earlier case stated: “ , 89 So.
- Dupre v. Dupre 72 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
-
Poor v. Hemenway
60 So. 2d 310
La. 1952
See Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Co., Ltd., , 89 So.
-
Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc.
29 So. 2d 33
La. 1946
This rule was followed in Rodgers v. Bolinger Co., Ltd., , 89 So.
-
Bennett v. Robinson
25 So. 2d 641
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
Rodgers v. S. H. Bolinger Co., Ltd., , 89 So.
-
Britton v. Myles
9 So. 2d 50
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Bolinger Company, Ltd., , 89 So.
- Snelling v. Adair 199 So. 782 La. 1940
- Landeche Bros. Co. v. New Orleans Coffee Co. 138 So. 513 La. 1931
-
Blache v. Reith
122 So. 730
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Rodgers vs. Bolinger, , 89 So.