U. Koen & Co. v. Accardo
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., May 3, 1968 210 So. 2d 97; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 19, 1941 4 So. 2d 550; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 27, 1925 2 La. App. 104; La., May 15, 1870 22 La. Ann. 307
U. Koen & Co. v. Accardo, 188 So. 2d 100 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- U. Koen & Co. v. Accardo 188 So. 2d 99
Opinion text
YARRUT, Judge. This is a companion suit to Suit No. 2305, 188 So.2d 99 , decided this day. The issues and facts in this suit are the same as those involved in Suit No. 2305, except that the indebtedness was the balance due on a promissory note, though the *101 amount due thereon was listed at less than that actually due. The name of Plaintiff, its address, and character of the debt were all properly stated. Only the amount due was incorrect. For the reasons given in Suit No. 2305 referred to supra, the judgment of the First City Court is affirmed. Judgment affirmed.