Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 15, 1966 190 So. 2d 101; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 10, 1927 7 La. App. 342; La., May 15, 1871 23 La. Ann. 513; La. Ct. App. 4th Cir., July 15, 1966 190 So. 2d 97
Insured Lloyds v. Ranger County Mutual Insurance, 212 So. 2d 255 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Co. 212 So. 2d 246
Opinion text
FRUGÉ, Judge. For the reasons given in Wallace M. Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Company, Clifton Auzenne, Clarence Batiste, Ranger County Mutual Insurance Company and Melvin Steely, 212 So.2d 246 (La.App.3d Cir., 1968), No. 2307 on our docket, consolidated herewith for trial purposes, the judgment of the trial court in this case is affirmed at appellants’ costs. Affirmed. HOOD, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in his dissenting opinion in Dahlquist v. Canal Insurance Co., 212 So.2d 246 .