Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Schick v. Jenevein, 82 So. 360.

34 citing documents.

Gordon v. General Motors Corp. 323 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Daigle v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. 165 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Belanger v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 159 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Davis v. Roberts 159 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago 159 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Davidson v. Morrison 153 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Frazier v. Muse, La.App., ; , 82 So.
Breaux v. Valin 138 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Service Fire Insurance Company v. Johnson 138 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Daniel v. Reed 137 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New York 129 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Broussard v. American Insurance Co. 127 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Hightower v. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. of Shreveport 117 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
32:231, 32:232, 32:233, subdivision C. Schick v. Jenevein, 1919, , 82 So.
Hargett v. Chemical Service, Inc. 116 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Schick v. Jenev[e]in, , 82 So.
Soileau v. Manuel 109 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1959
Miller v. Hayes, La.App., ; , 82 So.
Lejeune v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 107 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Neely v. Cotton Baking Co. 106 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Carhee v. Scott 104 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Marcantel v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 102 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Company 102 So. 2d 451 La. 1958
Le Bourgeois v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co. 101 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Guidry v. Crowther 96 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Rizley v. Cutrer 95 So. 2d 139 La. 1957
Noland v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 94 So. 2d 671 La. 1957
Teche Lines, Inc. v. Gorum 13 So. 2d 291 La. 1943
Nuss v. MacKenzie 4 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
The facts surrounding and forming part of an automobile accident may be such as to raise the inference that the accident was due to negligence on the part of the person operating or in control of the automobile.'" , 82 So.
Pegg v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co. 167 So. 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
That the rule as stated has found application in Louisiana is evidenced by a reading of various cases, , 82 So.
Lacy v. Lucky 140 So. 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Manget Bros. v. Henry 127 So. 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
898 ; Schick vs. Jenevein, , 82 So.
Pruett v. Brantley 127 So. 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
898 ; Schick vs. Jenevein, , 82 So.
Gauvereau v. Checker Cab Co. 131 So. 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
334 , ; Manceaux v. Hunter, 148 La.
Whipple v. Lirette 124 So. 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
So while the fact that one that is on the *488 wrong side of the highway is to be considered, and may make a prima lacie case of negligence against him, it is not necessarily conclusive.” Most of the above provisions were quoted approvingly by the Supreme Court in Schick vs. Jenevin, , 82 So.
Stout v. Lewis 123 So. 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
334 , ; Manceaux vs. Hunter Canal Company, 148 La.
Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc. v. Shaw 8 La. App. 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
sion, which supports the testimony of defendant rather than that' of the witnesses for plaintiff, and we are of the opinion that the preponderance of the evidence shows that the collision occurred while defendant was driving on the wrong side of the roadway, and defendant carried the burden of proof to show that such circumstance was not' the proximate cause of the collision (Schick vs. Jenevein, , 82 So.
Potter v. Glassell 83 So. 898 La. 1920