DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mack v. Legeai, 81 So. 694.

17 citing documents.

  • Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc. 217 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Generally, that provision of the statute is applicable only “in cases not falling within any of the provisions” otherwise affording benefits, , 81 So.
  • Golden v. Starns-McConnell Lumber Corp. 172 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Bergeron v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company 141 So. 2d 832 La. 1962
  • Jones v. New Orleans Furniture Mfg. Co. 17 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
    ses, maintaining that the provisions of subsection (e) of section 8 of the statute, allowing compensation for a serious and permanent disfigurement about the face or head, or for a serious and permanent impairment of the usefulness of any member or physical function, are not applicable to an injury for which compensation is specifically provided for elsewhere in the statute, viz.: , 81 So.
  • Bell v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corporation 152 So. 766 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    where the usefulness of a member or any physical function is seriously permanently impaired, the court of proper jurisdiction as hereinafter provided may allow such compensation as is reasonable in proportion to the compensation hereinabove specifically provided in the cases of specific disabilities above named, not to exceed fifty per centum of wages during one hundred weeks.” , 81 So.
  • Rodriguez v. Standard Oil Co. 117 So. 269 La. 1928
    maintaining that the provisions of sub-_ section (e) of section 8 of the statute, allowing compensation for a serious and permanent disfigurement about the face or head, or for a serious and permanent impairment of the usefulness of any member or physical function, are not applicable to an injury for which compensation is specifically provided for elsewhere in the statute, viz.: , 81 So.
  • Landwehr v. American Can Co. 5 La. App. 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
    See Mack vs. Legeai, , 81 So.
  • Fisher v. Pfeifer & Co. 4 La. App. 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
    Plaintiff’s injury certainly was covered by one of those paragraphs and we believe by S. (a) “temporary total disability” from November 10th to April 27th for which he has been paid in full by his employer, Mack vs. Leglai, , 81 South.
  • Black v. Louisiana Cent. Lumber Co. 109 So. 538 La. 1926
  • Burton v. Kaucher 3 La. App. 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    Mack vs. Legeai, , 81 South.
  • Sexton v. Querbes 3 La. App. 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    The Supreme Court, in Mack vs. Legeai, , 81 South.
  • Davis v. Gillis 2 La. App. 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    The cases Mack vs Legeai, , 81 South.
  • Legrand v. United States Sheet & Window Glass Co. 2 La. App. 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    See Mack vs. Legeai, , 81 South.
  • Stansbury v. Texas Co. 1 La. App. 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    See also Mack vs. Legeai, , 81 South.
  • Bryant v. Texas Pipe Line Co. 1 La. App. 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
    (See Mack vs. Legeal, , 81 South.
  • Garr v. Wyatt Lumber Co. 85 So. 040 La. 1920
  • Hardin v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co. 85 So. 202 La. 1920
    ws: “For injury producing permanent partial disability, the compensation shall be one-half of the difference between the wages of the injured employs before the injury and the wages which he is able to earn thereafter subject to a maximum of ten dollars per week to be paid for the period of disability not exceeding 300 weeks.” A , 81 South.