Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Breen v. Walters, 91 So. 50.

21 citing documents.

  • Malatesta v. Lowry 130 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    578 , ; Ciaccio v. Carbajal, 145 La.
  • Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Excel Machine Works, Inc. 95 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    578 , , the plaintiff sustained a single skull fracture and was allowed only $1,000, but no application for an increase in the award' was made.
  • Norman v. State 69 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
    578 , , the opinion of the Supreme Court contains this declaration: "The testimony is conflicting, but there is sufficient testimony, if accepted as true, to sustain the verdict of the jury, who are the exclusive judges of the credibility of the witnesses and of the weight and sufficiency of their testimony.
  • Roberts v. Radalec, Inc. 64 So. 2d 189 La. 1953
    578 , , a suit relating to a trial by jury, the court said: “The trial judge gave his sanction to their verdict, after hearing the witness- ' es in the case, which necessarily adds weight to the presumption of its correctness.” In Rickerson v. Town of Minden, 127 La.
  • Crawford v. Magnolia 4 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    578 , , being three decisions of our Supreme Court.
  • Lambert v. Cire 179 So. 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    578 , , also relied upon by defendants, the injured party sustained a single fracture of the skull and $1,000 was allowed, but there no application for an increase was made by the plaintiff.
  • Tesoro v. Abate 173 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
    578 , ; Davis v. Hochfelder, 153 La.
  • Thomas v. Harman 170 So. 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
    578 , ; Lasyone v. Zenoria Lumber Co., 163 La.
  • Hanover v. Brady 148 So. 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    586 , , Thompson v. Commercial National Bank, 156 La.
  • May v. Schepis 147 So. 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    578 , ; Landry v. Monteleone, 150 La.
  • Herbert v. Herrlitz 146 So. 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
    578 , , in construing article 2716 and with particular reference to the contention that certain repairs enumerated in the last paragraph thereof should be made by tenants, the Supreme Court refused to hold that such repairs should have been made by the tenant in that case and said: “There is no testimony in the record t
  • Caulfield v. Saba 144 So. 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
    578 , ; Boutte v. N. O. Terminal Co., 139 La.
  • White v. Juge 142 So. 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
  • Quatray v. Wicker 134 So. 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
  • Divas v. Noto 134 So. 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    578 , ; Brown v. Losch, 8 La.
  • Vanosby v. Creidman 131 So. 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
    578 , ; Klein v. Young, supra.
  • Clark v. Greco 127 So. 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    578 , ; Landry vs. *661 Monteleone, 150 La.
  • Price v. Florsheim 127 So. 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
  • Viola v. Convery 122 So. 90 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
  • Lasyone v. Zenoria Lumber Co. 111 So. 670 La. 1927
    578 , ; Schoppel v. Daly, 112 La.
  • Klein v. Young 111 So. 495 La. 1926
    578 , ; Davis v. Hochfelder, 153 La.