Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Peyton v. Roth, 88 So. 773.

17 citing documents.

Cassagne v. Justice 472 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Sabrier v. Leard 426 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Joyner v. Batchelor 206 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Beatty v. Beatty 186 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
On that subject, see Peyton v. Roth, 149 Louisiana 150, .” In Peyton v. Roth, supra, the Supreme Court, in annulling two sales as simulations, stated: “Beyond the testimony of the defendant and his wife, and the declaration in Schlumbrect’s will, there is no evidence whatever that he received any consideration for either sale.
Dare v. Myrick 168 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
Burch v. Nichols 126 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Smith v. Smith 119 So. 2d 827 La. 1960
Dietz v. Dietz 94 So. 2d 656 La. 1957
Camus v. Camus 91 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Thigpen v. Thigpen 91 So. 2d 12 La. 1956
Dietz v. Dietz 80 So. 2d 414 La. 1955
Harper v. Rosenblath 79 So. 2d 863 La. 1955
Stipe v. Simon 66 So. 2d 330 La. 1953
Succession of Combre 47 So. 2d 734 La. 1950
Civil Code Article 2480; , 88 So.
Mock v. Travis 7 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Agricultural Supply Co. v. Lavigne 155 So. 764 La. 1934
Giles v. Kelly 110 So. 738 La. 1926