Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Allies Oil Co. v. Ayers, 92 So. 720.

15 citing documents.

Hilcorp Energy I, L.P. v. Merritt Operating, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Frey v. Amoco Production Co. 603 So. 2d 166 La. 1992
Willis v. International Oil & Gas Corp. 541 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Scurlock Oil Co. v. Getty Oil Co. 324 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Ree Corporation v. Shaffer 246 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
"Since, in this state also, `when parties own lands or leases or other property in common and cannot agree between themselves, the obvious course for them to follow is to demand a partition thereof between them ( , 92 So.
Scott v. Hunt Oil Company 152 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
Huckabay v. Texas Company 78 So. 2d 829 La. 1955
Huckabay v. Texas Co. 73 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Delta Drilling Co. v. Oil Finance Corporation 196 So. 914 La. 1940
Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Reese 196 So. 558 La. 1940
Freeman v. Depression Oil Co. 159 So. 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
United Gas Public Service Co. v. Arkansas-Louisiana Pipe Line Co. 147 So. 66 La. 1932
Since, in this state also, “when parties own lands or leases or other property in common and cannot agree between themselves, the obvious course for them to follow is to demand a partition thereof between them ( , 92 So.
Curran v. Jones 112 So. 492 La. 1927
891 ; R. C. C. 501; 22 , 92 So.
Rosenthal-Brown Fur Co. v. Jones-Frere Fur Co. 110 So. 630 La. 1926
891 ; R. C. C. 501; 22 , 92 So.