Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Valley v. Clay, 92 So. 308.

14 citing documents.

Blanchard v. Ogima 215 So. 2d 902 La. 1968
Ramsey v. Kallio 62 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
Starnes v. Monsour's No. 4 30 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
Whittington v. Western Union Tel. Co. 1 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Healey v. Playland Amusements, Inc. 199 So. 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Wisemore v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co. 183 So. 247 La. 1938
But the following ' , 92 So.
Waddell v. Langlois 158 So. 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Jones v. Shehee Ford Wagon & Harness Co. 157 So. 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Bearman v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 134 So. 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
‘The test of the master’s responsibility,’ says Judge Cooley, ‘is not the motive of the servant, but whether that which he did was something which his employment contemplated, and something which, if he should do it lawfully, he might do in the employer’s name.’ Cooley, Torts, p. 536.” , 92 So.
Griffin v. Motor Transit Co. 127 So. 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Valley vs. Clay, , 92 So.
Jefferson v. King 124 So. 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Valley vs. Clay, , 92 So.
May v. Yellow Cab Co. 114 So. 836 La. 1927
May v. Yellow Cab Co. 6 La. App. 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
was committed within the scope of ' the employment.” And in the case of Valley vs. Clay, , 92 South.
Rapier v. J. J. Troxclair & Sons 1 La. App. 763 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1925
*765 ■See also Valley vs. Clay, , 92 South.