No. 23487
Precedential
Affirmed.
Processed
Schmalz v. Schmalz
Schmalz v. Schmalz, 84 So. 166 (La. 1920).
Cited by
- Diecidue v. Isacks 64 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
- Schneider v. Schneider 38 So. 2d 732 La. 1949
- Slagle v. Slagle 17 So. 2d 923 La. 1944
- Bonanno v. Decedue 173 So. 756 La. 1937
Opinion text
O’NIELL, J. [1, 2] The defendant appeals from a judgment of separation granting his *877 wife the custody and control of their minor children. The judgment is supported by un-contradicted evidence, making absolute proof, that the defendant defamed his wife and treated her so cruelly that her living with him became intolerable. No argument has been made, or reason advanced, for annulling the decree. The judgment appealed from is affirmed at appellant’s cost.