Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Russo v. Aucoin, 7 So. 2d 744.

24 citing documents.

Milbert v. Answering Bureau, Inc. 120 So. 3d 678 La. 2013
Although decided well before our present system of comparative fault, (La.App.
Kelda Wells v. Melvin Price La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Rivet v. Regions Bank 838 So. 2d 1290 La. 2003
Williams v. City of New Orleans 433 So. 2d 1129 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Smith v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co. 426 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Hall v. Ponds 338 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Cavalier v. City of New Orleans 273 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Farris v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 242 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
the Court of Appeal on page 747 said: “When the negligence of one person alone is the sole proximate cause of an accident, he is liable to anyone who suffers injury to his person or damage to his property as a result of the accident.
Thomas v. Johnson 181 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
In Russo v. Aucoin, La.App., , the Court held: “(1) The proximate cause of an accident may be the negligence of one person or it may be the negligence of several people.
Welch v. Welch 169 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Seale v. Checker Cab Company 137 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
In Russo v. Aucoin, La.App., , it was held that a motorist whose view ahead is obstructed by a curve in the road or other obstruction should drive at a speed which will permit him to stop before arriving at any vehicle, person, animal, or obstruction in the road.
Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. 137 So. 2d 298 La. 1962
473 , ; Nieolle v. Roberts, La.App., ; Russo v. Aucoin, La.App., .
Hinton v. Beyl 122 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
1 Cir., ; Weitkam v. Johnston, La.
Mire v. Thomas 116 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Richardson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. 116 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
1 Cir., ; Weitkam v. Johnston, La.App.
Stephens v. Natchitoches Parish School Board 110 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
660 ; Russo v. Aucoin, La.App., ; Forst v. Travelers Insurance Co., La.
Lindsley-Feiber Motor Company v. Brumfield 111 So. 2d 555 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Russo v. Aucoin, La.App., .
Newman v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 110 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
1 Cir., ; Weitkam v. Johnston, La.App.
Johnson v. Wilson 97 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
1 Cir., ; Weitkam v. Johnston, La.App.
Edelman v. Refrigeration Equipment Co. 72 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
this Court through Mr. Joseph A. Loret, Judge Ad Hoc, stated: “The proximate cause of an accident ■ may bé the -negligence of one person or ■ it may be the negligence of several people.
A. J. Hodges Industries v. Fobbs 39 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Cox v. Louisiana Department of Highways 25 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
App., , as authority for the rule, which he urges should be applied in the instant case, to the effect that it is negligence to drive a motor vehicle at a greater rate of speed than is prudent under the circumstances.
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc. 24 So. 2d 148 La. 1945
For him to drive at a greater rate of speed than that under such circumstances is imprudence and negligence.” Russo v. Aucoin, La.App., .
Forst v. Travelers Ins. Co. 15 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
If any case is to be cited as being somewhat apposite we might refer to that of Russo v. Aucoin et al., La.App., , involving an accident in a curve on the same highway as the one on which the present accident occurred and from the opinion in which we quote: "In our opinion, when a motorist's view ahead is obstructed by a curve in the road or any other obstruction, he should drive at a speed which will permit him to stop before a

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by