Gaudoz v. Blanque
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 18, 1968 212 So. 2d 135; La. Ct. App. 5th Cir., December 5, 1966 192 So. 2d 873; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., November 10, 1927 8 La. App. 37
Gaudoz v. Blanque, 23 La. Ann. 520 (1871).
Cited by
- Bank of Leesville v. Wingate 48 So. 1005 La. 1909
Opinion text
Ludeling, C. J. This is an appeal from an order of seizure and sale. The only question for decision is, was there sufficient authentic evidence to authorize the fiat? We think not. The act of mortgage and notes purport to be executed by Charles de Hault de Lassus as-agent of Miss Blanque. There is no proof of this agency in the record'. 12 R. 238 , Dosson, curator v. Sanders; 1 R. 407 ; 2 An. 491. It is therefore adjudged that the order of seizure and sale be annulled, and that the appellee pay costs of this appeal.