Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. Hochfelder, 95 So. 598.

14 citing documents.

Murphy v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 165 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
"As for lack of knowledge and consequent neglect to repair the existing defect, we regard this question as having been so definitely disposed by our jurisprudence as to obviate the necessity for citation, , 95 So.
Murphy v. Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York 138 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
The opinion then proceeded to acknowledge the author's awareness of landlord and tenant cases in which the Louisiana courts had applied the article to fact situations not involving "ruin", , 95 So.
Malatesta v. Lowry 130 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Gaida v. Hourgettes 67 So. 2d 737 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Preuett v. STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 62 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
897 , L.R.A.1917E, 809; , 95 So.
Lynch v. Fisher 34 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
897 , L.R.A.1917E, 809; , 95 So.
Coulton v. Caruso 195 So. 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Tesoro v. Abate 173 So. 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Thomas v. Harman 170 So. 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
Price v. Florsheim 127 So. 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
670, 2322; Davis vs. Hochfelder, , 95 So.
Kelly v. During 6 La. App. 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Davis vs. Hochfelder, , 85 South.
Lasyone v. Zenoria Lumber Co. 111 So. 670 La. 1927
Klein v. Young 111 So. 495 La. 1926
Gallman v. Young 3 La. App. 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Davis vs. Hochfelder, , 95 South.