Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dawkins v. Mitchell, 90 So. 396.
- Alice Landry Boyer and Cheryl Landry Kokkinis v. Stric-Lan Companies Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Boyer v. STRIC-LAN COMPANIES CORP. 888 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
- Glod v. Baker 851 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
- Mary v. Lupin Foundation 609 So. 2d 184 La. 1992
- Levy v. Billeaud 443 So. 2d 539 La. 1984
- Edwins v. Lilly 422 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
- Beyer v. F & R Oilfield Contractors, Inc. 407 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Dean v. Hercules, Inc.
314 So. 2d 430
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Specifically the Court said: "We are of the opinion that the obligation imposed upon land owners by Article 667, is an obligation owed to an indefinite class of persons and is therefore not a special obligation to particular persons such as we have in Dawkins [ , 90 So.
- Gulf Insurance Co. v. Employers Liability Assur. Corp. 170 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
- Pool v. Pool 16 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
- Orlando v. Nix 129 So. 810 La. 1930
- Smalley v. Bernstein 115 So. 347 La. 1927
-
Dawkins v. Mitchell
111 So. 464
La. 1927
Plaintiffs allege that the receiver has been discharged and that his bond has been canceled, and “that said bank now owes no debts and is no longer in existence.” , 90 So.
- Lagrone v. Brown 109 So. 490 La. 1926