Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Texana Oil & Refining Co. v. Belchic, 90 So. 522.

15 citing documents.

Sanders Family, LLC No. 1 v. Sanders 82 So. 3d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
88 , (1922), Neal v. Daniels, 217 La.
CENLA PHYSICAL THERAPY & REHAB. AGENCY INC. v. Lavergne 657 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
88 , (1922), the court in ODECO Oil stated: `The employee is duty bound not to act in antagonism or opposition to the interest of the employer.
ODECO Oil & Gas Co. v. Nunez 532 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
88 , (1922), quoting U.S. v. Carter, 217 U.S. 286 , 30 S.Ct.
Regions v. Regions 381 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
In Re Kennedy 357 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
Realty Mart, Inc. v. Greenwell Commercial Properties, Inc. 343 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
88 , (1922), quoting U. S. v. Carter, 217 U.S. 286 , 30 S.Ct.
LaFleur v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 296 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Bolding v. Eason Oil Co. 170 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1965
88 , , ‘The employee is duty bound not to act in antagonism or opposition to the interest of the employer.
Dealers Building Material Supply Co. v. Campbell 89 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
88 , ; Rappeport v. Patten, La.App., ; Clarke v. Patton, La.App., , 586: “ ‘The party who seeks to avail himself of a change of domicile bears the burden of proving it.
Robinson v. Commercial Cattle Co. 82 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
88 , , and again in Neal v. Daniels, 217 La.
Neal v. Daniels 47 So. 2d 44 La. 1950
88 , , “The employee is duty bound not to act in antagonism or opposition to the interest of the employer.
Foreman v. Pelican Stores 21 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
Clarke v. Patton 16 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1944
88 , , a case in which the validity of a writ of attachment, predicated on the alleged non-residence of the defendant, was challenged.
Rappeport v. Patten 3 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
88 , , a case in which the validity of a writ of attachment, predicated on the alleged nonresidence of the defendant, is challenged.
Succession of Webre 136 So. 67 La. 1931