Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Barchus v. Johnson, 92 So. 566.

16 citing documents.

Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 144 So. 3d 791 La. 2013
Civ.Code art.1927; , 92 So.
Pittman v. Pomeroy 552 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
3rd Cir.1984), writ denied, and the exercise of options to buy real estate, , 92 So.
Greenleaf Plantation, Inc. v. Kieffer 403 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Briggs v. Siggio 285 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Jurisprudence under these articles holds that both the agreement granting an option to buy immovables and the exercise of the option must be in writing, , 92 So.
Torrey v. Simon-Torrey, Inc. 284 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Box v. Karam 252 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
However, in a case like the present where the time allowed for acceptance of the offer is specified, there can be no question as to the intention of the proposer, , 92 So.
Alley v. New Homes Promotion, Inc. 247 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Thompson v. Bullock 236 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Russell v. Armington 162 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Zemurray v. Boe 105 So. 2d 243 La. 1958
Louisiana State Board of Education v. Lindsay 79 So. 2d 879 La. 1955
619 , Barchus v. Johnson, *562 , 92 So.
Dane & Northrop v. Selzer 63 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Di Cristina v. Weiser 42 So. 2d 868 La. 1949
In Re Industrial Homestead Ass'n 198 So. 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
Conklin v. Caffall 179 So. 434 La. 1938
Alex F. Dreyfous Co. v. Keifer 122 So. 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Article 1798 Revised Civil Code provides that: “As there must be two parties at least to every contract, so there must be something proposed by one and accepted and agreed to by another to form the matter of such contract; the will of both parties must unite on the same point.”' In Barchus vs. Johnson, , 92 So.