Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Young v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co., 86 So. 268.
-
State v. Champagne
206 So. 2d 518
La. 1968
822 , ; State v. Wooderson, 213 La.
-
State v. Vines
162 So. 2d 332
La. 1964
822 , ; State v. Wooderson, 213 La.
-
State v. Harrell
93 So. 2d 684
La. 1957
822 , ; State v. Edwards, 155 La.
-
State v. McDonell
23 So. 2d 230
La. 1945
822 , ; State v. Edwards, 155 La.
-
State v. Tucker
15 So. 2d 854
La. 1943
822 , ; State v. Edwards, 155 La.
-
State v. Dow
14 So. 2d 610
La. 1943
822 , ; State v. Edwards, 155 La.
-
State v. Martinez
10 So. 2d 712
La. 1942
822 , ; State v. Edwards, 155 La.
-
State v. Wilson
198 So. 889
La. 1940
822 , ; State v. Edwards, 155 La.
-
State v. Gendusa
190 So. 332
La. 1939
822 , , the court, in affirming the conviction and sentence of the accused, said: “(2, 3) No doubt, if from the record an accused appears to have been convicted without any evidence at all having been produced against him — literally none at all — a question purely of law is presented.
-
State v. Wall
180 So. 476
La. 1938
822 , .” (Italics ours.)
-
State v. O'Day
175 So. 838
La. 1937
822 , , this court said: “ ‘If an accused appears to have been convicted without any evidence .at all having been produced against him, literally none at all, a question purely of law is presented on appeal.’ *185 “In State v. Dunnington [ 157 La.
-
State v. Gremillion
106 So. 716
La. 1925
822 , ; Fernandez v. Perez, 151 La.
-
State v. Holder
105 So. 232
La. 1925
822 , , this court said: “If an accused appears to have been convicted without any evidence at all having been produced against him, literally none at all, a question purely of law is presented on appeal.” In State v. Dunnington, 102 So.
- State v. Dunnington 102 So. 478 La. 1924
- State v. Giangosso 102 So. 429 La. 1924
- State v. Gani 102 So. 318 La. 1924