Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite London Guarantee & Accident Ins. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R., 95 So. 771.
- Martin v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. 628 So. 2d 1213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Criticized
Great SW Fire Ins. Co. v. CNA Ins. Companies
557 So. 2d 966
La. 1990
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
- Sentry Indem. Co. v. Rester 430 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
-
Veuleman v. Sims
382 So. 2d 245
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
In a footnote at this point in the opinion, the Supreme Court added that this new rule, of requiring parties to obtain a subrogation from the injured party, was effective notwithstanding the ruling apparently to the contrary in London Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Courtney v. Harris
355 So. 2d 1039
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Great American Insurance v. Davis
217 So. 2d 675
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Having reached this conclusion, it is unnecessary for us to discuss plaintiff’s further contention that under London Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
American Indemnity Co. v. New York F. & M. Under., Inc.
196 So. 2d 592
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
- National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Ins. Co. 175 So. 2d 263 La. 1965
-
National Surety Corp. v. Standard Accident Insurance
175 So. 2d 263
La. 1965
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
- Bouis v. Employers Liability Assurance Corporation 160 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
-
McDaniel v. Hearn
158 So. 2d 348
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. Allen
132 So. 2d 240
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
913 ; London Guarantee & Accident Insurance Company v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Company, , 95 So.
-
McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co.
129 So. 2d 66
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
London, Guarantee and Accident Insurance Company v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Company, , 95 So.
-
Pellegrin v. Canal Insurance Co.
111 So. 2d 568
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
In London Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co. v. Vicksburg S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
American Bankers Insurance Co. of Fla. v. Costa
107 So. 2d 76
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
We engaged upon a full discussion of this proposition in Hansen v. Hickenbotham, La.App., , wherein we stated: "The question raised by the objection to the subrogation seems to have been passed upon by our Supreme Court in London, Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Marquette Casualty Company v. Brown
103 So. 2d 269
La. 1958
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
- Lumber Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Kemp 102 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
-
Forcum-James Co. v. Duke Transportation Co.
93 So. 2d 228
La. 1957
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ruiz
77 So. 2d 84
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
In London, Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
John M. Walton, Inc. v. McManus
67 So. 2d 130
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
In London Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co. v. Vicksburg S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Board of Com'rs v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EX REL. PUBLIC BELT R. COMMISSION
65 So. 2d 313
La. 1953
913 ; London Guarantee and Accident Insurance Company v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Home Ins. Co. v. Highway Ins. Underwriters
62 So. 2d 828
La. 1952
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Hansen v. Hickenbotham
61 So. 2d 620
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
The question raised by the objection to the subrogation seems to have been passed upon by our Supreme Court in London Guarantee & Accident Insurance Co. v. Vicksburg S. & P. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
International Paper v. Arkansas Louisiana M.R. Co.
35 So. 2d 769
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
The Supreme Court in London Guarantee and Accident Insurance Company v. Vicksburg, S. P. Railway Company, , 95 So.
- St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. Standard Cas. S. 3 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
-
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Benton
153 So. 479
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. R. Co., , 95 So.
-
Universal Automobile Ins. Co. v. Manisalco.
148 So. 731
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Co. v. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. R. Co., , 95 So.
- Independence Indemnity Co. v. Carmical & Woodring 127 So. 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
-
Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Carpenter
125 So. 504
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
London Guaranty & Accident Insurance Company v. V. S. & P. Railway Company, , 95 So.
-
Southern Surety Co. v. Morgan's L. & T. R. R. & S. S. Co.
6 La. App. 575
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Co. vs. Vicksburg, S. & P. R. Co., , where the court held: “Insurer paying compensation under Act 20 of 1914 has right of action against third person responsible for the injury, etc.” 2.
-
Gaiennie Co. v. Chisolm
3 La. App. 358
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
913 ; London Guaranty & Accident Insurance Co. vs. Vicksburg, S. & P. Railway Co., , 95 South.