Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Southall v. Smith, 92 So. 402.

25 citing documents.

Teche Lines, Inc. v. Gorum 13 So. 2d 291 La. 1943
See, also, 2 Bashfield’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Perm.Ed., §§ 919 and 942 ; 45 C.J. 713, Section 95; , 92 So.
Broussard v. Hotard 4 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Blahut v. McCahil 163 So. 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
To proceed ahead when one is utterly blinded, as the driver of this car says he was, at a speed of twenty-five miles an hour, is the grossest kind of negligence.” , 92 So.
Hataway v. F. Strauss & Son, Inc. 158 So. 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
O'Rourke v. McConaughey. 157 So. 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Wyble v. Putfork 141 So. 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Safety Tire Service, Inc. v. Murov 140 So. 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
And the Supreme Court of the state has announced a , 92 So.
Locke v. Shreveport Laundries, Inc. 137 So. 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Bacon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 137 So. 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Robichaux v. Dorion 134 So. 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Cloverland Dairy Products Co. v. Leach 134 So. 433 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Independent Oil Refining Co. v. Lueders 134 So. 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Quatray v. Wicker 134 So. 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Woodley v. Schuster's Wholesale Grocery Co. 124 So. 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
648 ; Southall vs. Smith, , 92 So.
Whipple v. Lirette 124 So. 160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
987 , , 27 A. L. R. 1194, the Court said: “An automobile driver can not put himself in a position where in order to save himself, he must run into somebody else and then plead that he could not help it and is therefore not liable.” In Kelly vs. Schmidt & Zeigler, 142 La.
Weinfield v. Yellow Cab Co. 120 So. 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
Ann. 967 , , 27 A. L. R. 1194.
Ward v. Donahue 8 La. App. 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
In Southall vs. Smith, , 92 South.
Blake v. Jefferson-St. Charles Transfer Co. 8 La. App. 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In the case of Southall vs. Smith, , 92 So.
Youman v. McConnell & McConnel, Inc. 7 La. App. 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
969 , ; Dill vs. Colley, 3 La.
Pepper v. Walsworth 6 La. App. 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
In Southall vs. Smith, , 92 South.
Parlongue v. Leon 6 La. App. 18 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Southall vs. Smith, , 92 South.
Cole v. Central Contracting Co. 5 La. App. 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
993 ; Southall vs. Smith, , 92 So.
Parker v. Baker Gasoline Co. 3 La. App. 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
The situation was such as required greater care on the part of the parties than would have been the case on a straight street, and where there were no obstructions (Southall vs. Smith, , 92 South.
Dill v. Colley 3 La. App. 305 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
742 ; Southall vs. Smith, , 92 South.
Campbell v. Haas 2 La. App. 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
In Southall vs. Smith, , 92 South.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by