Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Atchafalaya Land Co. v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co., 84 So. 351.

38 citing documents.

Sarah Allen Davidson v. Terrance Hardy La. 2026
Williams Cypress Co., 84 So.
Ring v. STATE, DOTD 835 So. 2d 423 La. 2003
Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
Guillory v. GUILLORY EX REL. ARCENEAUX 615 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
Villescas v. TJ Ward Gen. Contractors, Inc. 504 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
Bd. of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. Dept. of Natural Resources 496 So. 2d 281 La. 1986
Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
Delerno v. Coastal States Gas Producing Co. 429 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
Reichenphader v. Allstate Ins. Co. 418 So. 2d 648 La. 1982
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board 317 So. 2d 576 La. 1975
If the act were confined to valid patents it would be almost or quite without use."' , 84 So.
Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Delacroix Corporation 285 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Stevens v. State Mineral Board 221 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Tucker 170 So. 2d 371 La. 1964
Mitchel v. Board of Commissioners 161 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Tucker 159 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
The standard of reason, and, conversely, a determination of the claim of arbitrary action, is to be found in Atchafalaya Land Company v. F. B. Williams Cypress Company, et al., , 84 So.
State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 928 La. 1961
State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 928 La. 1961
State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Rycade Oil Corp. v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, ETC. 129 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Fiedler v. Pipes 107 So. 2d 409 La. 1958
California Co. v. Price 74 So. 2d 1 La. 1954
Thurmon v. Hogg 72 So. 2d 500 La. 1954
13:5062].’ “The title of Act 38 of 1902 is as follows: “ ‘To authorize the institution of suits to establish title to real estate where none of the parties are in the actual possession of the same.’ ” “Likewise, counsel for plaintiff cites Atchafalaya Land Company v. F. B. Williams Cypress Company, 1920, [ 84 So.
Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State Mineral Board 64 So. 2d 839 La. 1953
Kemper v. Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. 37 So. 2d 844 La. 1948
et al., Interveners), , 84 So.
State v. Aucoin 20 So. 2d 136 La. 1944
Lum Chow v. Board of Com'rs 13 So. 2d 857 La. 1943
Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
Lum Chow v. Board of Com'rs for Lafourche Basin Levee Dist. 13 So. 2d 857 La. 1943
Realty Operators, Inc. v. State Mineral Board 12 So. 2d 198 La. 1942
Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Board of Commissioners 9 So. 2d 409 La. 1942
173 ; Atchafalaya Land Co., Ltd., v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
Chapman-Storm Lumber Co. v. Board of Com'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist. 200 So. 455 La. 1941
To support their contention they rely principally on the cases of Atchafalaya Land Company v. F. B. Williams Cypress Company, Ltd., , 84 So.
Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. Allison 200 So. 273 La. 1941
State Ex Rel. Muslow v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp. 176 So. 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Anent this principle, , 84 So.
State Ex Rel. Fitzpatrick v. Grace 175 So. 656 La. 1936
State ex rel. Richardson v. Recorder of Mortgages 125 So. 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
1064 , , the court said: “Counsel for the plaintiff and interveners cite Cooley’s Constitutional Limitations, Black’s Constitutional Law, and Watson on the Constitution, in support of the well-recognized doctrine that a statute cannot, under the guise of merely changing the remedy for asserting a right or for enforcing
Board of Com'rs of Tensas Basin Levee Dist. v. Earle 125 So. 619 La. 1929
Board of Com'rs of Tensas Basin Levee Dist. v. Hardtner 114 So. 494 La. 1927
Williams Cypress Co., , 84 So.
State v. Sweet Lake Land & Oil Co. 113 So. 833 La. 1927
If the act were -confined to valid patents it would be almost or quite without use.’ ” , 84 So.
State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs v. Grace 109 So. 830 La. 1926
it was said, on pages 1063 and 1064 of the Louisiana Reports, 84 So.
Atchafalaya Land Co. v. Dibert, Stark & Brown Cypress Co. 102 So. 871 La. 1925
The foregoing recital of the pleadings disclose the fact that the case is similar in all respects to that of Atchafalaya Land Co. v. F. B. Williams Cypress Co., reported , 84 So.
Bradley v. City of New Orleans 95 So. 718 La. 1923