No. 23822 Precedential Rule made absolute, and the District Judge directed to recognize and respect the right of relatrix to be represented in court by Processed

Wright's Estate v. Waterbury

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed December 3, 1919 · 83 So. 374

Cited by

State v. Rideau 137 So. 2d 283 La. 1962
State v. Sheffield 93 So. 2d 691 La. 1957
State v. Alleman 51 So. 2d 83 La. 1950
State v. Joseph 46 So. 2d 118 La. 1950
State v. Reed 19 So. 2d 28 La. 1944
State v. Holmes 18 So. 2d 40 La. 1944
State v. White 101 So. 136 La. 1924

Opinion text

O’NIELL, J. The issue presented in this mandamus proceeding is the same as in the case of Levi Brown v. Treville Guillot (No. 23809) ante, p. 46, 83 South. 373 , decided today. The district judge denies the right of rela-trix to be represented in court by an attorney in fact, in a suit in which she is plaintiff and appellee' in the district court. Eor the reasons assigned in the case of Brown v. Guillot (No. 23809) decided to-day, the rule issued herein is now made absolute, and the district judge is directed to recognize and respect the right of relatrix to be represented in court by the attorney in fact appointed by her.