DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Rose, 84 So. 643.

17 citing documents.

  • State v. Larson 653 So. 2d 1158 La. 1995
    Applying this rationale to the instant case, , 84 So.
  • State v. Crater 388 So. 2d 802 La. 1980
  • State v. Defrances 351 So. 2d 133 La. 1977
  • State v. Reeves 342 So. 2d 605 La. 1977
  • State v. Edwards 261 So. 2d 649 La. 1972
  • State v. Fulmer 193 So. 2d 774 La. 1967
  • State v. Williams 182 So. 2d 526 La. 1966
    or in any public manner, of any act of lewdness or indecency, grossly scandalous and tending to debauch the morals and manners of the people; •« h= h< * ” The court considered that “the performance of any act of lewdness or indecency” was so vague and indefinite as to be objectionable and lacked the clarity of “lewd dancing” , 84 So.
  • State v. Hertzog 131 So. 2d 788 La. 1961
    § 2421 et seq.], have treated the words ‘other immoral purpose’ when used alone as not being susceptible of a definite and fixed meaning, and have construed these words to mean ‘prostitution’ and ‘debauchery’ because of their association with the words ‘prostitution’ and ‘debauchery,’ * * , 84 So.
  • State v. Christine 118 So. 2d 403 La. 1960
  • Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Boisvert 103 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1958
  • State v. Murtes 94 So. 2d 446 La. 1957
    In support of its judgment the trial court relied upon and cited: , 84 So.
  • State v. Dominguez 88 So. 2d 660 La. 1956
  • City of Shreveport v. Brewer 72 So. 2d 308 La. 1954
    The contention is levelled at the failure of the Ordinance to define the words “satisfactory explanation.” , 84 So.
  • State v. Saibold 34 So. 2d 909 La. 1948
  • State v. Truby 29 So. 2d 758 La. 1947
    It is the corruption of the morals, honesty and good habits of the people that constitutes the nuisance.” I cannot imagine a better precedent for a ruling in this case than the decision in State v. Rose, 1920, , 84 So.
  • Town of Ponchatoula v. Bates 138 So. 851 La. 1931
    245 , , the court reaffirmed its ruling in the Mioton Case, and further said: “It was there, held (referring to the Mioton Case) to be properly within the province of the trial judge to decide whether any particular case of desertion or nonsupport was ‘without just cause.’ ” In State v. Rose, 147 La.
  • State v. Harris 90 So. 686 La. 1922