Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Werk v. Leland University, 99 So. 716.

26 citing documents.

Lamson Petroleum Corp. v. Hallwood Petroleum Inc. 824 So. 2d 1194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Lamson Petroleum Co. v. Hallwood Petroleum, Inc. 770 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Werk vs.[v.] Leland University, , 99 So.
Bernard v. Broussard 538 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Werk v. Leland University [ ], 99 So.
Bernard v. Somme 501 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Triangle Development, (1st Cir.1985); (3rd Cir.1980); (4th Cir. 1964).
Triangle Development, Inc. v. Burns 469 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Angelle v. Prejean 391 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Tate v. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. 386 So. 2d 139 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Trustee Corp. v. Allen 359 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
State v. Placid Oil Company 274 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Harris v. Bourgeois 272 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Eves v. Morgan City Fund 252 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Crane v. Sun Oil Co. 223 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Werk v. Leland University, 1924, , 99 So.
Young v. Stevens 209 So. 2d 25 La. 1968
O’Reilly v. Poché, , 99 So.
Action Finance Corporation v. Nichols 180 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
Wood v. Giardina 175 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1965
O'REILLY v. Poche 162 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
Harper v. Home Indemnity Company 140 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Littleton 125 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Corley v. Colgin 121 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
It is a well-settled principle of law that a plat referred to in a deed controls the lines and limits of properties thereby conveyed; Flanagan v. Elder, La.App., , , 99 So.
Isacks v. Deutsch 114 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Flanagan v. Elder 90 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Lear v. Great Nat. Development Co. 41 So. 2d 668 La. 1949
They rely on Article 2557, Revised Civil Code; , 99 So.
Appel v. Ennis 34 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
Byrne v. Ortte 33 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1948
Casso v. Ascension Realty Co. 196 So. 1 La. 1940
Tennent v. Caffery 129 So. 128 La. 1930
972 , , the plaintiff brought suit to recover a part of the price paid for certain real estate on the theory that there was a shortage in the area of the land.