Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Caldwell v. City of Shreveport, 90 So. 763.

23 citing documents.

Evangelia Bilalis v. Wallace Drennan and Zurich American Insurance Company La. 2025
As this court has long stated, “[t]he recovery of legal interest on the 8 judgment from the date of judicial demand is therefore a matter of absolute right.” 90 So.
Kaylonna Dotson v. Darren Balsamo and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Raines v. Columbia Lakeland Medical Center 923 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Smith v. Quarles Drilling Co. 885 So. 2d 562 La. 2004
Caldwell v. City of Shreveport , , 90 So.
Robnett v. Great American Insurance Co. of NY 187 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Defendant submits, however, that in an assessment of damages a preexisting ailment or disease should be given consideration, *158 , 90 So.
Blanchard v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 153 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Reeves v. State 80 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
Valence v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 50 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Moore v. Blanchard 43 So. 2d 599 La. 1949
Brooks v. Airline Motor Coaches 35 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
They invoke the rule for assessing damages in a , 90 So.
Guercio v. State 15 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Layne v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 164 So. 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Act No. 206 of 1916 provides: “That legal interest shall, hereafter, attach from date of judicial demand, on all judgments, sounding in damages, 'ex de-licto,’ which may be rendered by any of the courts in the State.” , 90 So.
Klein v. Medical Building Realty Co. 147 So. 122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Grennon v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 136 So. 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
In view of the phraseology of Act No. 206 of 1916, the amendment asked for is unnecessary.” , 97 So.
Weller v. Turnerized Roofing Co. 129 So. 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
uld hardly have been contended that defendant was not liable- for the disability, although it may have been prolonged by the disease, pneumonia, as in compensation cases, where the injury results in disability which is continuous, the law does not attempt to distinguish between that caused by the injury and that which may be more particularly attributed to disease ( , 90 So.
Price v. Florsheim 127 So. 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Defendant strenuously urges that the judgment is excessive in amount, and relies on the authority of the decision in the case of Caldwell vs. City of Shreveport, , 90 So.
Patrick v. Grayson & Yeary 127 So. 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
In the case of Caldwell vs. City of Shreveport, , 90 So.
Distinguished Gillespie v. Lee 123 So. 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
From this point of view, we think that, although the exciting cause of the disease was the tubercle bacilli, the plaintiff’s right to recover for the damages resulting from the disease is distinguishable from the case presented in Caldwell vs. City of Shreveport, , 90 So.
Arndt v. D. H. Holmes Co. 119 So. 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
469 , ; Haddad vs. Commercial Motor Truck, 150 La.
Henderson v. Louisiana Power Co. 121 So. 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
ld hardly have been contended that defendant was not liable for the disability, although it may-have been prolonged by the disease, pneumonia, as the compensation cases, where the injury results in disability which is continuous, the law does not attempt to distinguish between that caused by the injury and that which may be more particularly attributed to disease (Caldwell vs. City of Shreveport, , 90 So.
Powe v. Morgan's La. & Tex. R. R. & S. S. Co. 7 La. App. 51 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Caldwell vs. City of Shreveport, , 90 South.
O'Neil v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship 5 La. App. 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Under like circumstances the Supreme Court .in the case of Caldwell vs. Shreveport, , 90 South.
Poncet v. South New Orleans Light & Traction Co. 3 La. App. 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
738 and Caldwell vs. Shreveport, , 90 South.