Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Liles v. Producers' Oil Co., 99 So. 339.

14 citing documents.

James Patrick Cluse D/B/A J. P. Cluse Construction v. H & E Equipment Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
670] Carter-Allen Jewelry Co. V. Overstreet, 165 La.
Cluse v. H & E Equipment Services, Inc. 34 So. 3d 959 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
490 ; Liles v. Producers’ Oil Co., , [ 231 La.
Northcott Exploration Co. v. WR Grace & Co. 430 So. 2d 1077 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
White v. Phillips Petroleum Company 232 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman 92 So. 2d 574 La. 1957
490 ; Liles v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 99 So.
Maxfield v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 65 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
192 ; and Mayer v. Ford, La.App., ; , 99 So.
Youngblood v. Burke 43 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
See, also, Liles v. Producers’ Oil Co., supra [ , 99 So.
Kramer v. Freeman 3 So. 2d 609 La. 1941
Succession of Dancie 186 So. 14 La. 1939
1037 , and Liles v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 99 So.
McGuire v. Monroe Scrap Material Co. 180 So. 413 La. 1938
In Liles v. Producers’ Oil Company, , 99 So.
Hodges v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. 141 So. 783 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
App. 511 ; Liles v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 99 So.
Liles v. Texas Co. 117 So. 229 La. 1928
O’NIELL, C. J. This is a sequel — in fact, a repetition — of the suit of Liles et al. v. Producers’ Oil Co. et al., , 99 So.
Stevenson v. Exchange Natl. Bank 120 So. 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
490 ; Liles vs. Producers Oil Co., , 99 So.
Carter-Allen Jewelry Co. v. Over-Street 116 So. 222 La. 1928
* * * Such being plaintiff’s cause of action, it is one for damages to the amount of the value of the property, arising ex delicto, and is governed by the prescription of one year prescribed by article 3536 of the Civil Code.” And in the case of Liles v. Producers’ Oil Co., , 99 So.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by