Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Satcher v. Radesich, 96 So. 35.
- Succession of Moffat 577 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Harris v. Ferguson 375 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
- Succession of Grubbs 182 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
- Noel v. Jumonville Pipe and MacHinery Company 158 So. 2d 179 La. 1963
- Sciambra v. Sciambra 153 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
-
Carter Oil Company v. King
134 So. 2d 89
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Interest must be allowed under the authority of Satcher, et al. v. Radesich, et al., 1923, , 96 So.
- Chaney v. Whitney 107 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
- Juneau v. Laborde 82 So. 2d 693 La. 1955
-
Whitten v. Monikhouse
29 So. 2d 800
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
However, plaintiff is entitled to interest at 5% , 96 So.
- Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land Fur Co. 17 So. 2d 827 La. 1944
- Hatch v. Morgan 12 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
- Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Hawkins 179 So. 21 La. 1938
- Succession of Porche 175 So. 670 La. 1937
-
Succession of Marcour
173 So. 587
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
The Supreme Court, in sustaining the plea of res adjudicata, , 96 So.
- In Re Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co. 168 So. 485 La. 1936
- Succession of Spyker 159 So. 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Vance v. Sentell 152 So. 513 La. 1933