DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Charbonnet v. State Realty Co., 99 So. 865.

23 citing documents.

  • Seaman v. Jimes 150 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
    The jurisprudence confirms that a “suit which has been abandoned for nonaction during [the statutory period] does not constitute a legal interruption to the course of prescription.” , 99 So.
  • Phillips' Bar & Restaurant, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 116 So. 3d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
  • Pounds v. Yancy 224 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Charbonnet v. State Realty Co., Ltd., , 99 So.
  • Andrieu v. Davis 205 So. 2d 181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • De Salvo v. Waguespack 187 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Charbonnet v. State Realty Co., Ltd., , 99 So.
  • State v. United Dredging Co. 50 So. 2d 826 La. 1951
  • Evans v. Hamner 24 So. 2d 814 La. 1946
  • Carmody v. Land 21 So. 2d 764 La. 1945
    “Definitive judgments are such as have the force of res judicata.” , 99 So.
  • Dugas v. Powell 21 So. 2d 366 La. 1945
  • City of New Orleans v. Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. 19 So. 2d 201 La. 1944
    Charbonnet v. State Realty Co., Ltd., , 99 So.
  • Sandfield Oil Gas Co. v. Paul 7 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    [1044], 1049, , it was said: "`The amended article (3519 of the Civil Code), when read in connection with the subject-matter of the section and of the article 3518, immediately preceding it, clearly means that a suit which has been abandoned for nonaction during a period of five years does not constitute a legal interruption t
  • Long v. Chailan 199 So. 222 La. 1940
  • Harrisonburg-Catahoula State Bank v. Meyers 185 So. 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    [1044] 1049, ; Losch v. Greco, 173 La.
  • Long v. Chailan 175 So. 42 La. 1937
  • Pill v. Morgan 172 So. 409 La. 1936
  • Verrett v. Savoie 141 So. 854 La. 1932
    1049 , ; Losch v. Greco, 173 La.
  • Losch v. Greco 136 So. 572 La. 1931
    1049 , , it was said: “The amended article- [3519 of the Civil Code], when read in connection with the subject-matter of the section and of the article 3518 immediately preceding it, clearly means that a suit which has been abandoned for .
  • Commercial Securities Co. v. Smith 126 So. 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    328 ; Charbonnet v. State Realty Co., Limited, , 99 So.
  • Byrne v. Commercial Security Co. 7 La. App. 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
    274 ; Charbonnet vs. State Realty Co., , 99 South.
  • Levenberg v. Shanks 115 So. 641 La. 1928
    328 ; Charbonnet v. State Realty Co., Limited, , 99 So.
  • Franek v. Turner 114 So. 148 La. 1927
    cata is not well founded, because the dismissal of a suit on the ground that five years have elapsed without any steps being taken in the prosecution of it, according to article 3519 of the Civil Code, as amended by the Act 107 of 1898, p. 155, does not decide any controversy, and is therefore not available as an estoppel or as the basis for a plea of res judicata, , 99 So.
  • Mouton v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship 5 La. App. 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1927
    401 , mentioned in p. 1050 , and we find nothing in any subsequent case indicating that the City of New Orleans vs. New Orleans Jockey Club, 129 La.
  • McBroom v. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. 2 La. App. 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    Charbonnet vs. State Realty Co., , 99 South.