Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dew v. Hammett, 91 So. 523.

28 citing documents.

Creek Management, L.L.C. v. Unopened Succession & Unknown Heirs or Legatees of Williams 223 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
1094 , (1922); Cockerham v. Cockerham, 44,578 (La.App.
Cockerham v. Cockerham 16 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
1094 , (1922); Simon v. Richard, 42 La.
Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Leon Hanson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1094, [(1922)]; Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
JUSTISS OIL CO., INC. v. Hanson 996 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
1094 , [(1922)]; Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
Tilley v. Unopened Succession of Howard 976 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
1094 , (1922); Simon v. Richard, 42 La.
Headrick v. Lee 471 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
1094 , (1922); Simon v. Richard, 42 La.Ann.
Dunham v. Nixon 371 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
1094 , (1922); Simon v. Richard, 42 La.Ann.
Givens v. Givens 273 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
1094 , (1922); Simon v. Richard, 42 La.Ann.
Southeastern Public Service Co. v. Barras 246 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
1094 , ; Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Naquin 167 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
1094 , ; Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
1094 , ; Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
Succession of Seals 150 So. 2d 13 La. 1963
1094 , .” Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co., 205 La.
Watkins v. Zeigler 147 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
1094 , ; Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
Wischer v. Madison Realty Co. 146 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1094 , ; Meridian Land & Mineral Corp. v. Bagents, 211 La.
Matthews v. Carter 138 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi 135 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
1094 , ; Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
Penfield v. Sowel 85 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
1094 , [524], said-: ■ “ ‘Article 1030 of the Civil Code declares that the faculty of accepting or renouncing a succession becomes barred by-the lapse of time required for the longest prescription of the rights to immovables.
Rodriguez v. Shroder 77 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
1094 , and Tillery v. Fuller, 190 La.
Sun Oil Co. v. Tarver 52 So. 2d 437 La. 1951
1094 , ; Succession of Waters, supra; Dileo v. Dileo, supra; Succession of Tyson, 186 La.
Dileo v. Dileo 46 So. 2d 53 La. 1950
1094 , and Tillery v. Fuller, 190 La.
Meridian Land & Mineral Corp. v. Bagents 30 So. 2d 563 La. 1947
Sanders De Hart v. Continental Land Fur Co. 17 So. 2d 827 La. 1944
In Re Gray's Succession 9 So. 2d 481 La. 1942
1094 , , and Generes v. Bowie Lumber Co., 143 La.
Tillery v. Fuller 182 So. 683 La. 1938
1094 , , and in the Succession of Tyson, 186 La.
Foscue v. Mitchell 182 So. 740 La. 1938
Hill v. Dees 178 So. 250 La. 1937
1094 , 1096, ; and J. D. Hill, by switching to himself the possession of a usufructuary of his brother’s interest could acquire no greater right of possession than the mother had, and, under the articles of the Code, could not thereafter change the character of that possession.
Jeanfreau v. Jeanfreau 162 So. 3 La. 1935
Gahn v. Brown 107 So. 576 La. 1925