Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Kittredge v. Grau, 103 So. 723.
- In Re Succession of Hebert 887 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
- Barrow v. Barrow 669 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
- Downs v. Downs 410 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
- Lane v. Lane 375 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
-
Guilott v. Guilott
361 So. 2d 1271
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
154 , , and Succession of Hollier, 247 La.
-
Succession of Guercio
359 So. 2d 996
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
384 , (1965), after the Court of Appeal had held a party's interest in a new partnership to be a community property although the party's interest in the original partnership was separate property, the Supreme Court remanded for specific evidence as to whether the successive partnership interests were merely "transformations" [ , 103 So.
- Phillips v. Nereaux 357 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
- Barnett v. Barnett 339 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
-
Primeaux v. Libersat
307 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
425 (1881); (2) exchanges, , 103 So.
- Noe v. Roussel 310 So. 2d 806 La. 1975
- Succession of Miangolarra 297 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
- Blalock v. Blalock 259 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
- Forest Oil Corp. v. Wood 240 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
- Ardoin v. LeBleu 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Succession of Sonnier 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
- Succession of Hollier 171 So. 2d 656 La. 1965
-
Succession of Hollier
158 So. 2d 351
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
The administrator, in contending that the decedent's interest in the partnership belongs to his separate estate, , 103 So.
- Joseph v. Travis 99 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
-
Lazaro v. Lazaro
92 So. 2d 402
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
[15] Kittredge v. Grau, 1924, , 103 So.
- Succession of Hemenway 83 So. 2d 377 La. 1955
- Guilbeau v. Guilbeau 71 So. 2d 129 La. 1954
- Bradford v. Ducote 49 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
- Bruyninckx v. Woodward 47 So. 2d 478 La. 1950
- Williams v. Williams 41 So. 2d 736 La. 1949
- Slaton v. King 36 So. 2d 648 La. 1948
- Cameron v. Rowland 40 So. 2d 1 La. 1948
- Slaton v. King 30 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
- Capillon v. Chambliss 29 So. 2d 171 La. 1946
- Thomas v. Thomas 27 So. 2d 758 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
- Baker v. Baker 26 So. 2d 132 La. 1946
- Rousseau v. Rousseau 24 So. 2d 676 La. 1946
- Succession of Farley 18 So. 2d 586 La. 1944
- State Ex Rel. Parish of Plaquemines v. Baynard 16 So. 2d 451 La. 1943
-
Sanderson v. Frost
3 So. 2d 626
La. 1941
In reaching this result, , 103 So.
- American Surety Co. v. Noble & Salter 199 So. 131 La. 1940
- Alengi v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 162 So. 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
- Smith v. Gloyd 162 So. 617 La. 1935
- State Ex Rel. Waterman v. J. S. Waterman & Co. 151 So. 422 La. 1933
-
White v. Tremont Lumber Co.
142 So. 165
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
In overruling the motion, , 103 So.
- Barcelo v. Barcelo 139 So. 765 La. 1932
- Foster & Glassell Co. v. Harrison 138 So. 99 La. 1931
- Ponchatoula Bank & Trust Co. v. Hoffman 135 So. 673 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
- Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. Savant 134 So. 394 La. 1931
-
Cory v. Askew
125 So. 455
La. 1929
the record has been sent up, and the case is now before us. •The minute entry of the motion and order of appeal is as follows: “Written motion filed by plaintiff for an order of devolutive appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, only in so far as the judgment herein rejects his demands; appeal granted, returnable December 3rd, 1928, without bond.” , 103 So.
-
Cory v. Askew
123 So. 435
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
In support of the position that plaintiff could not be held to have acquiesced, even though it should be shown that he had issued execution on the judgment and forced payment, plaintiff cites Kittredge vs. Grau, , 103 So.
- Peters v. Klein 109 So. 349 La. 1926
-
Miller v. Miller
107 So. 702
La. 1926
She may assert and prove the fact, whenever it is questioned.” Kittredge v. Grau, on Rehearing, , 158 La.
-
Overruled
Bryan v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.
2 La. App. 494
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
See: Kittridge vs. Grau, , 103 South.
-
Chandler v. Oil Fields Gas Co.
2 La. App. 778
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
ON MOTION TO DISMISS On the authority of Kittridge vs. Grau, , 103 South.