Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Shipp v. Bordelon, 94 So. 399.
-
Adams v. Hicks Co.
149 So. 242
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
796 , 800, .’ “Eor the reasons assigned, the plaintiff’® demands will have to be rejected.
- Charity Hospital of Louisiana v. Morgan 143 So. 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Charity Hospital of Louisiana v. Board of School Directors 140 So. 60 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1932
- White v. Equitable Real Estate Co. 139 So. 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
- Foret v. Paul Zibilich Co. 137 So. 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
-
Davilla v. Fruit Dispatch Co.
121 So. 191
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
797 , , and Dejean vs. Ujiffy, 15 Orl.
-
Lay v. Pugh
119 So. 456
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
App. 17 ; Shipp vs. Bordelon, , 94 So.
-
Jarrell v. Ewing
7 La. App. 502
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Plaintiff concedes that under the construction which has been -given to the statute, a householder, or one who employs workmen to repair his dwelling house, as to such work has been held not to be liable under the statute for compensation to workmen who may be injured while engaged in such work (Shipp vs. Bordelon, , 94 So.
- Byas v. Hotel Bentley, Inc. 103 So. 303 La. 1924