Hall v. H. E. & W. T. Ry. Co.
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., October 31, 1968 215 So. 2d 160; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 13, 1967 195 So. 2d 307; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 14, 1928 121 So. 769; La., December 15, 1869 21 La. Ann. 736
Hall v. H. E. & W. T. Ry. Co., 121 So. 769 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- J. D. Simms & Sons v. New Orleans & N. E. R. 122 La. 268
- McHenry Horse Exchange v. Illinois Cent. R. Co. 148 La. 49
Opinion text
REYNOLDS, J. On the urgent representations of plaintiffs, appellees, that there was error in our opinion and judgment, we granted a rehearing in this case. On ■ reviewing our opinion and judgment we are constrained to adhere to the opinion, that the case is controlled by that of Simms & Sons vs. N. O’. & N. E. R. R. Co., 122 La. 268 , 47 So. 602 , cited and approved in McHenry Horse Exchange vs. 111. Cent. R. R. Co., 148 La. 49 , 86 So. 649 . It is therefore ordered that our former opinion and decree be and it is hereby reinstated and made the opinion and judgment of the court. WEBB, J., dissents.