Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gueydan v. T. P. Ranch Co., 100 So. 541.

19 citing documents.

Garrett v. Walker 407 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Greenleaf Plantation, Inc. v. Kieffer 403 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Skye Realty Co. v. Diversified Insurance Agency, Inc. 221 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Russ v. United Farm Equipment Co. 89 So. 2d 380 La. 1956
Trichel Contracting Co. v. Little Creek Oil Co. of Louisiana 84 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Acadian Production Corp. of Louisiana v. Tennant 63 So. 2d 343 La. 1953
“A course of conduct pursued by a corporation for many years, in permitting an officer to do an authorized act, is an ' acquiescence in such act and creates an estoppel.” , 100 So.
Harrosh v. Fife Bros. Health Ass'n 1 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
Ranch Company, , 100 So.
Smith v. Trippe Motors, Inc. 193 So. 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
797 ; Gueydan v. T. P: Ranch Company, , 100 So.
Labatt v. Louisiana Adjustment Bureau, Inc. 185 So. 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund v. B. G. Carbajal, Inc. 156 So. 416 La. 1934
Moreover, we consider it a matter of much importance that defendant, in a written instrument, the execution of which was authorized by a formal resolution of its board of directors, declares that: “The said principal indebtedness is represented by a note made and executed by Carbajal, Inc.” , 100 So.
Donohoe Oil & Gas Co. v. MacK-jourden Co. 144 So. 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Act No. 190 of 1912; , 100 So.
Scharfenstein & Sons, Inc. v. Item Co. 141 So. 463 La. 1932
McCain v. Foster 134 So. 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
City Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Shreveport Brick Co. 134 So. 397 La. 1931
Le Blanc v. Guy 128 So. 715 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Harris v. H. C. Talton Wholesale Grocery Co. 123 So. 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
The latest expression in point by our own courts which we have been able to find is the ease of Gueydan vs. T. P. Ranch Co., , 100 So.
Interstate Trust & Banking Co. v. Hebert 7 La. App. 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Counsel, in connection with his reference to Act 190 of 1912, cites the case of Gueydan vs. T. P. Ranch Co., reported in , 100 So.
Howell v. Titus 7 La. App. 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
399 , ; Bomer-Ferguson Co. vs. Shapiro, 148 La.
Max Barnett Furniture Co. v. Martel 3 La. App. 234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
720 ; Gueydan vs. T. P. Rauch Co., , 100 South.