Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Craft v. Gulf Lumber Co., 91 So. 736.

33 citing documents.

Blanchard v. Travelers Insurance Company 121 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
282 , ; Hicks v. Meridian Lumber Co., 152 La.
Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 99 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Stringer v. Brown Paper Mill Co. 66 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Stokes v. Miller 50 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Henderson v. E. L. Dalton & Co. 47 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Rivero v. Leaveau 45 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co. 25 So. 2d 625 La. 1946
Waggener v. Forcum-James Co. 191 So. 736 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Of course, if it could be determined from the evidence that plaintiff at the time of the accident had merely a potential hernia or a congenital weakened condition of the abdominal wall and that the blow or lick from the ladder-caused the hernia to develop, ' , 91 So.
Piper v. Spiro 188 So. 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
Smith v. Turner Lumber Co. 174 So. 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
n injury to his finger, making it useless, and had received compensation for 20 weeks under the provisions of the statute allowing re *701 cover}'' for the specific loss of a member, he could not recover “for loss of his wage-earning capacity under subsection (c), allowing compensation for an injury producing partial disability to do work of any reasonable character.” , 91 So.
Jackson v. Travelers' Ins. Co. 156 So. 169 La. 1934
Stovall v. S. Bender Iron & Supply Co. 152 So. 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Jacobs v. Southwestern Gas & Electric Co. 150 So. 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Musgrove v. Louisiana Highway Commission 149 So. 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
Roussel v. Colonial Sugars Co. 147 So. 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
589 , L. R. A. 1918F, 862; , 91 So.
McPherson v. Hillyer Deutsch-Edwards, Inc. 143 So. 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
282 , ; Hicks v. Meridian Lumber Co., 152 La.
Wright v. Louisiana Ice & Utilities Co. 138 So. 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
589 , L. R. A. 1918F, 862; , 91 So.
Patrick v. Grayson & Yeary 127 So. 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
1918F, 862 ; Craft vs. Gulf Lumber Co., , 91 So.
Arndt v. D. H. Holmes Co. 119 So. 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
Arender v. Grant Timber & Manufacturing Co. 119 So. 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
589 , L. R. A. 1918F, 862; Craft vs. Lumber Co., , 91 So.
Watson v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd. 7 La. App. 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Counsel for plaintiff relies, it seems, confidently on the ease of Craft vs. Gulf Lumber Company, , 91 South.
Dixon v. Eula Lumber Co. 6 La. App. 206 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Plaintiff’s demand is supported by Craft vs. Gulf Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Fisher v. Pfeifer & Co. 4 La. App. 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Womack v. New Orleans Public Service Inc. 5 La. App. 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Craft vs. Gulf Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Moffet v. Crusaders Oil Producing Co. 3 La. App. 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Plaintiff’s contention that in addition to the amount allowed him for the loss of two phalanges from each of the third, fourth and fifth fingers of the left hand he should be allowed compensation for the loss of a physical function is in direct conflict with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Craft vs. Gulf Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Becton v. Deas Paving Co. 3 La. App. 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
975 , the court said: “It is quite immaterial for the purposes of this case whether the alleged strain brought on the aneurism, or merely *687 hastened the inevitable rupture; for this court would allow compensation in either case.” The court then cites the case of Craft vs. Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Burton v. Kaucher 3 La. App. 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Defendants insists that under the authority of Craft vs. Gulf Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Sexton v. Querbes 3 La. App. 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
In Craft vs. Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Reed v. Holderith 3 La. App. 378 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Dedman v. Caddo Steel Products Co. 2 La. App. 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Defendant refers us to the case of Craft vs. Gulf Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Connell v. United States Sheet & Window Glass Co. 2 La. App. 93 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
“In Craft vs. Lumber Co., , 91 South.
Grisham v. Wray-Dickinson Co. 1 La. App. 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1924
Hicks v. Meridian Lumber Co. 94 So. 903 La. 1922