No. 2459.
Precedential
Processed
Rahier v. Rester
Rahier v. Rester, 11 So. 2d 87 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942).
Cited by
- First Nat. Bank of Commerce v. Ordoyne 528 So. 2d 1068 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
- Garrett v. Walker 407 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
- Wigwam, Inc. v. Judice 345 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
- General Tire Service v. Nash 273 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Landry v. Flaitz 184 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
- Hagedorn Motors, Inc. v. Godwin 170 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
- Montgomery v. Gremillion 69 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
Opinion text
I might possibly agree with the majority opinion on the proposition that the defendant did not give his consent to the purchase of the refrigerator by his wife, but I cannot agree that by his action subsequently, he did not ratify the sale. The question of ratification, vel non, has to be decided on the facts that were presented to the Court and on which the trial Judge found for the plaintiff. As I am not convinced of any manifest error on his part, I am obliged to dissent from the judgment, which reverses his decision. *Page 93