Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., 100 So. 547.
-
State of Louisiana v. William Serigne, Sr. and Lionel Serigne, Jr.
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
1972) (citing Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., So.
-
VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
801 So. 2d 331
La. 2001
peremptory exceptions cannot be binding upon the trial court when it *335 timelybut laterdetermines error of judgment based upon the matter as submitted or upon subsequent disclosures in the record which require a contrary holding."); Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
- Terrio v. Terrio 522 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
- Sider v. Robin Temporary Service 515 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
- Succession of Velasquez-Bain 471 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
-
RG Claitor's Realty v. Juban
391 So. 2d 394
La. 1980
Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., supra ; Labourette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
- Bordelon v. Dauzat 389 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
-
Flynn v. Devore
373 So. 2d 580
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
115 , and Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
-
Arnold v. Stupp Corporation
249 So. 2d 276
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
See Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
-
Overruled
Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co.
250 So. 2d 224
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
In Labourdette v. Doullut and Williams Ship Building Co., Inc., , 100 So.
-
Hawkins v. Employers Casualty Company
177 So. 2d 613
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
381 ; Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., Inc., , 100 So.
-
Sanderson v. Binnings Construction Company
172 So. 2d 721
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
992 , ; Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
-
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.
110 So. 2d 784
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
See Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Ship Building Co., , 100 So.
-
Dixon v. Herrin Transportation Co.
81 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
381 ; Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., Inc., , 100 So.
-
Shumake v. Home Indemnity Co.
68 So. 2d 789
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
In support of the contention that plaintiff’s remedy, under the allegations of the petition, is exclusively governed by Act 20 of 1914, as amended, the following cases are cited: Labourdette v. Doullot & Williams, , 100 So.
- Vidrine v. Soileau 38 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
-
Bourgeois v. J. W. Crawford Const. Co.
36 So. 2d 13
La. 1948
In granting the award the court observed .in the course of the opinion, among other things, that, “The presumption is that the contract is to be governed by the act regulating the rights and remedies of the employer and employee, in the absence of any agreement or notice to the contrary.” Again, in Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Company, Inc., 1924, , 100 So.
-
Atchison v. May
10 So. 2d 785
La. 1942
115 , and Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
-
Brooks v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co.
7 So. 2d 658
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
On the question of the exclusiveness of the remedy and the question of election to come under the act in hazardous occupations, we think the two cases of Labourdette v. Doullut Williams Ship-building Co., Inc., , 100 So.
-
Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works
2 So. 2d 668
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
549 ; Labourdette v. Doullut Williams Shipbuilding Company, Inc., , 100 So.
-
McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
199 So. 175
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
See Labourdette v. Doullut, etc., Co., , 100 So.
-
Comeaux v. South Coast Corporation
178 So. 513
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
Particular reliance is placed in the case of Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
-
Dourrieu v. Bd. Com'rs Port of New Orleans
158 So. 581
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1935
See Labourdette v. Doullut, etc., Co., , 100 So.
-
Liner v. Riverside Gravel Co.
127 So. 146
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
141 ; Labourdette vs. Doullut & Williams, etc., Co., , 100 So.
-
Holthaus v. Lane Cotton Mills Co.
3 La. App. 314
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Following a most recent ruling of the Supreme Court made in the case of Labourdette vs. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Company, , 100 South.