Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., 100 So. 547.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. William Serigne, Sr. and Lionel Serigne, Jr. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
    1972) (citing Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., So.
  • VaSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 801 So. 2d 331 La. 2001
    peremptory exceptions cannot be binding upon the trial court when it *335 timely—but later—determines error of judgment based upon the matter as submitted or upon subsequent disclosures in the record which require a contrary holding."); Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
  • Terrio v. Terrio 522 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Sider v. Robin Temporary Service 515 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • Succession of Velasquez-Bain 471 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • RG Claitor's Realty v. Juban 391 So. 2d 394 La. 1980
    Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co., supra ; Labourette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
  • Bordelon v. Dauzat 389 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Flynn v. Devore 373 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    115 , and Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
  • Arnold v. Stupp Corporation 249 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    See Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
  • Overruled Babineaux v. Pernie-Bailey Drilling Co. 250 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    In Labourdette v. Doullut and Williams Ship Building Co., Inc., , 100 So.
  • Hawkins v. Employers Casualty Company 177 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    381 ; Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., Inc., , 100 So.
  • Sanderson v. Binnings Construction Company 172 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    992 , ; Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
  • Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co. 110 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    See Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Ship Building Co., , 100 So.
  • Dixon v. Herrin Transportation Co. 81 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    381 ; Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., Inc., , 100 So.
  • Shumake v. Home Indemnity Co. 68 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    In support of the contention that plaintiff’s remedy, under the allegations of the petition, is exclusively governed by Act 20 of 1914, as amended, the following cases are cited: Labourdette v. Doullot & Williams, , 100 So.
  • Vidrine v. Soileau 38 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
  • Bourgeois v. J. W. Crawford Const. Co. 36 So. 2d 13 La. 1948
    In granting the award the court observed .in the course of the opinion, among other things, that, “The presumption is that the contract is to be governed by the act regulating the rights and remedies of the employer and employee, in the absence of any agreement or notice to the contrary.” Again, in Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Company, Inc., 1924, , 100 So.
  • Atchison v. May 10 So. 2d 785 La. 1942
    115 , and Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
  • Brooks v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. 7 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
    On the question of the exclusiveness of the remedy and the question of election to come under the act in hazardous occupations, we think the two cases of Labourdette v. Doullut Williams Ship-building Co., Inc., , 100 So.
  • Spanja v. Thibodaux Boiler Works 2 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941
    549 ; Labourdette v. Doullut Williams Shipbuilding Company, Inc., , 100 So.
  • McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 199 So. 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1940
    See Labourdette v. Doullut, etc., Co., , 100 So.
  • Comeaux v. South Coast Corporation 178 So. 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1938
    Particular reliance is placed in the case of Labourdette v. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Co., , 100 So.
  • Dourrieu v. Bd. Com'rs Port of New Orleans 158 So. 581 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1935
    See Labourdette v. Doullut, etc., Co., , 100 So.
  • Liner v. Riverside Gravel Co. 127 So. 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
    141 ; Labourdette vs. Doullut & Williams, etc., Co., , 100 So.
  • Holthaus v. Lane Cotton Mills Co. 3 La. App. 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
    Following a most recent ruling of the Supreme Court made in the case of Labourdette vs. Doullut & Williams Shipbuilding Company, , 100 South.