Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Glover v. Abney, 106 So. 735.
-
Jackson v. Jackson
411 So. 2d 684
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
2nd Cir. 1968); , 106 So.
- Criticized Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ruiz 367 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
- Fontenot v. Manuel 281 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
- Delcambre v. Dubois 263 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
-
Succession of Teagle
206 So. 2d 753
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
A case which appears apropos to the contention that parol evidence should have been accepted by the trial court by virtue of the provisions of Article 2444 , 106 So.
- Gross v. Brooks 130 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
- Griffin v. Bank of Abbeville & Trust Co. 88 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
-
J. F. Auderer Laboratories, Inc. v. Deas
67 So. 2d 179
La. 1953
The other case cited by counsel, , 106 So.
- Taylor v. Brown 66 So. 2d 578 La. 1953
- Serio v. Chadwick 66 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
- Lawrence v. Claiborne 41 So. 2d 680 La. 1949
- Franton v. Rusca 175 So. 66 La. 1937
-
Farris v. Miller
159 So. 132
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
2 , where the court said: “That there is no vente á reméré unless the *133 right tu take back the property, on refunding the price, be stipulated in the act of sale, so as to form one of the reservations of it; and that if the stipulation is appended by a subsequent act to a sale originally pure and simple, it is either a resale or a promise to sell.” , 106 So.
- Locascio v. First State Bank & Trust Co. 123 So. 304 La. 1929