Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 101 So. 871.

73 citing documents.

Williams v. Shadow 77 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
See: Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Company, 1924, , 101 So.
Di Pietro v. Le Blanc 68 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
Reech v. Coco 65 So. 2d 790 La. 1953
4 .See Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., 1924, , 101 So.
Perkins v. Chatry 58 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
279 ; Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., , 101 So.
Aubry v. Todd 55 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
Magee Nash Motors v. Green 47 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
J. B. Beaird Co. v. Burris Bros. 44 So. 2d 693 La. 1949
Bonnette v. Ponthieux 41 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Savoie v. Snell 35 So. 2d 745 La. 1948
Nelson v. M. C. M. Truck Lines 25 So. 2d 236 La. 1946
279 ; Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., , 101 So.
Harris v. Halligan 23 So. 2d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1945
We have read and attempted to compare the present case with the facts in the two cases of Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Company Ltd. , 101 So.
American Furnace Co. v. Great Southern Air C. Co. 16 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Company, Ltd., , 101 So.
Maddox v. Katz 8 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
If the thing is so affected, it cannot be considered that the seller has sold a thing `fit for the purpose intended,' unless the warranty has been expressly waived, , 101 So.
Hemenway, Inc. v. Roach 175 So. 892 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Roby Motors Co. v. Price 173 So. 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Roby Motors Co. v. Cade 158 So. 840 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
Brown-Roberts Hardware & Supply Co. v. Evans 153 So. 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Roby Motors Co. v. Harrison 139 So. 686 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
Plauche, Locke Securities, Inc. v. B. Bazerque & Sons 139 So. 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
The implied obligation of warranty which was incumbent on the plaintiff was . , 101 So.
Standard Motor Co. v. St. Amant 134 So. 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1931
Stracener v. Nunnally Bros. MoTor Co. 121 So. 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
purpose intended.” Crawford vs. Abbott Automobile Co., , 101 So.
Jackson v. Breard Motor Co. 120 So. 478 La. 1929
Roses v. Patorno 2 La. App. 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
The vendor warrants the thing sold to be fit for the purpose for which it was intena ed unless warranty be expressly waived Crawford vs. Abbott Automobile Co., , 101 South.