Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Otis v. Texas Co., 96 So. 1.
- Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
- Magee v. Amiss 502 So. 2d 568 La. 1987
- Meares v. Pioneer Production Corp. 382 So. 2d 1009 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
- Cattle Farms, Inc. v. Abercrombie 211 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
- Wells v. Joseph 95 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Dileo v. Dileo 46 So. 2d 53 La. 1950
-
Succession of Valdez
44 So. 2d 151
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1950
48 ; Lotz et al. v. Citizens Bank & Trust Company et al., La.App., ; , 96 So.
- J. B. Beaird Co. v. Burris Bros. 44 So. 2d 693 La. 1949
-
Charlton v. Bailey
12 So. 2d 646
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1943
On the issue that is presented under the exception, , 96 So.
- Louisiana Truck & Orange Land Co. v. Page 5 So. 2d 365 La. 1941
- Stone v. Jefferson 200 So. 461 La. 1941
- Cook v. Crow 194 So. 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
-
Sharpe v. Hayes
171 So. 862
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1937
Corp. et al. v. Gandy et al., supra, , 96 So.
-
Masters v. Cleveland
158 So. 382
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
385 , ; Westwego Canal & Term.
- Succession of Ipser 157 So. 380 La. 1934
- Zuchowski v. Hingle 149 So. 142 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1933
- Succession of McMahon 145 So. 269 La. 1932
-
Ory Bros. v. Muller
128 So. 903
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
Ann. 784 .” Otis et al. vs. Texas Co. et al., , 96 So.
- Land Development Co. v. Schulz 124 So. 125 La. 1929
-
Carlton v. Durr
120 So. 124
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1928
384 , , and a long list of authorities there cited.
-
International Accountants Society v. Santana
7 La. App. 594
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
“To execute a voluntary ratification, under C. C. Art. 2272, the act must be executed with the intention to confirm and ratify, and must evince such intention .clearly and unequivocally.” Otis vs. Texas Co., , 96 South.