Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Freeman & Freeman v. Torre Realty & Improvement Co., 103 So. 334.

14 citing documents.

Sleet v. Williams 291 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
835 , and authorities there cited, Freeman [& Freeman] v. Torre [Realty & Improvement Co.,] , 103 So.
Saturn Realty, Inc. v. Muller 196 So. 2d 321 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1967
5 ; see Freeman & Freeman v. Torre Realty & Improvement Co., , 103 So.
Corbitt v. Robinson 53 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1951
835 , and cases cited therein; Freeman & Freeman v. Torre Realty & Improvement Co., , 103 So.
Lawrence v. Baley 41 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
835 , and authorities there cited; , 103 So.
Cobb v. Saucier 30 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
835 , and authorities there cited, Freeman [ Freeman] v. Torre [Realty Improvement Co.,] , 103 So.
Latter & Blum, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. 23 So. 2d 193 La. 1945
Freeman & Freeman v. Torre Realty & Improvement Co., , 103 So.
Ramsey v. Harry Bros. Co. 11 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1942
Gamblin v. Young 187 So. 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
835 , and authorities there cited; , 103 So.
Mobley-Rosenthal, Inc. v. Weiss 152 So. 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
Crasto v. Pohlman 127 So. 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
We believe the case of Freeman & Freeman vs. Torre Realty & Improvement Co., , 103 So.
O'Neal v. Southland Lumber Co. 121 So. 755 La. 1929
1094 , , simply holds that an owner of land may place it in the hands of as many brokers as he sees fit, as long as no exclusive agency is given; and, where several brokers are employed, the one who first produces a customer and is the procuring cause of the sale is entitled to the commission, to the exclusion of the other b
Viguerie v. Mathes 120 So. 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
621 ; Freeman vs. Torre, , 103 So.
Clesi v. Cooney 7 La. App. 182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
Bullis Thomas v. Calvert 110 So. 621 La. 1926
835 , and authorities there cited; , 103 So.