Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Gregory v. Standard Oil Co., 91 So. 717.
- Griffitts v. Tiger Well Service, Inc. 226 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
- Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc. 217 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
- Fourcade v. Ryan Stevedoring Co. 107 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
- Haynes v. Loffland Bros. Co. 40 So. 2d 243 La. 1949
- Haynes v. Loffland Bros. Co. 34 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1948
- Winfrey v. Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. 19 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1944
- McCaskill v. Lyon Lumber Co. 154 So. 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- Overruled Keyhea v. Woodard-Walker Lumber Co. 147 So. 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
- Lewis v. Southern Advance Bag & Paper Co. 147 So. 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
-
Galt v. Travelers' Ins. Co.
141 So. 105
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1932
he deduction of the living expenses of the deceased son from his contributions to his parents, if the written statement of plaintiffs is eliminated from consideration, it is our opinion that the testimony of plaintiffs is sufficient to prove that they were “partially actually dependent upon his earnings for support at the time of the accident and death.” , 91 So.
- Hoy v. T. S. Grayson Lumber Co. 130 So. 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
- Zeller v. Louisiana Cypress Lumber Co. 121 So. 670 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1928
-
Rupp v. Reimann Manufacturing Co.
7 La. App. 634
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1928
In Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 So.
-
Hammons v. Edwards
6 La. App. 752
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
(Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 South.
-
Joseph v. Board of Commissioners
5 La. App. 678
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1927
798 : “ ‘Dependent to any extent’ is a very broad term, and seems to us to include necessary aid furnished for the discharge of any legal obligation, as well as aid required merely in supplying the personal wants of the recipients.” In Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 South.
-
Schnelz v. Brown Paper Mill Co., Inc.
5 La. App. 421
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
Plaintiffs’ counsel cite in support of their contention the eases of: Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 South.
-
Rome v. Mexican Petroleum Corp.
3 La. App. 523
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
In Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 South.
-
Hansen v. Ohio Oil Co.
2 La. App. 690
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
Counsel have also referred us to the case of Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 South.
-
Jones v. Louisiana Central Lumber Co.
2 La. App. 260
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1925
508 , 92 South, 38 , our Supreme Court said: “When an employee is going from his work to his lodging house, on the premises where he works, he is within the meaning of paragraph 2 of Section 1 of the Employer’s liability Act, ‘performing services arising out of and incidental to his employment in the course of his employer’s trade, business or occupation.” Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 South.
-
Nelson v. W. K. Henderson Iron Works & Supply Co.
1 La. App. 332
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1924
We refer to Gregory vs. Standard Oil Co., , 91 South.