DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Young v. Cistac, 103 So. 100.

13 citing documents.

  • Harrison v. Smith 814 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    771, 774-775 , (1925) where the Supreme Court said: It is elementary that an assignee acquires his rights under the contract assigned to him only in accordance with the stipulations contained in said contract, and that he is without authority to change or add to such stipulations in making an assignment of his rights under the
  • HERLITZ CONST. CO., INC. v. Matherne 476 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • Lusher v. Kilcrease 384 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    443 (La.1909); Cryer v. M & M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
  • Law v. Blackshire 367 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
  • McMikle v. O'NEAL 207 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    771 , (1925), the Court stated it was powerless to enforce a contract which did not provide for the terms of payment.
  • Driskell v. Sumlin 125 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Collins v. Brunet 114 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    771 , , a purchaser of real estate offered to buy certain property for $5,682.50, terms 'one-half cash, note 7% interest’, and in passing upon the validity of the agreement in that case the court said: ‘The contract in this case is silent as to the terms for payment of the balance of the purchase price when one-half ca
  • Reuther v. Bergeron 59 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    771 , ; In Re Industrial Homestead, La.App., 198 So.
  • Belaire v. Elder 49 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
  • Richardson v. Charles Kirsch & Co. 189 So. 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1939
  • Turnbull v. Goldblum 160 So. 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1935
    771, 772 , , and Monteleone v. Blache, 11 La.
  • Dunn v. Spiro 153 So. 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
    771 , , a purchaser of real estate offered to buy certain property for $5,682.50, terms “one-half cash, note 7% interest,” and in passing upon the validity of the agreement in that case the court said: “The contract in this case is silent as to the terms for payment of the balance of the purchase price when one-half ca
  • State Ex Rel. Bond v. Register of Conveyances 110 So. 559 La. 1926