Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Martin v. Martin, 92 So. 46.
- Hightower v. Schwartz 151 So. 3d 903 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
- DeVillier v. DeVillier 543 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Dooley v. Dooley 443 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
- Sklar v. Sklar 387 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
- Garrett v. Garrett 324 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
- State v. Brady 310 So. 2d 593 La. 1975
-
Stewart v. Stewart
175 So. 2d 692
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Although the facts in Martin v. Martin [ ], 92 So.
- Walker v. Walker 159 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
- Pace v. Pace 144 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
- Collins v. Collins 193 So. 702 La. 1940
- New v. New 173 So. 748 La. 1937
- Gremillion v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 172 So. 163 La. 1937
- Futch v. Futch 146 So. 318 La. 1933
-
Stephens v. Kellogg Lumber Co.
137 So. 769
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1931
“In,the construction of statutes, words are to be taken and construed in the sense in which they are-understood in common language, taking into consideration the text and subject-matter relative to which they are employed.” , 92 So.
- Vicknair v. Terracina 113 So. 787 La. 1927
-
Dupuy v. Pertuit
98 So. 250
La. 1923
The gravamen of the plaintiff's complaint, and the main contention of her counsel in his brief is that there has been no reconciliation within the meaning of article 153 of the Civil Code, as interpreted in ' , 92 South.