Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCane v. Barker Baking Co., 95 So. 227.
-
Walsh Bros. v. Celeron Corp.
501 So. 2d 307
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Newton, supra at 523 citing Burgin Bros. & McCarl v. Barker Baking Co., [ ] 95 So.
-
Newton v. Inter-American, Inc.
209 So. 2d 522
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Likewise in Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
State v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co. of NY
149 So. 2d 632
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
Grand v. American General Insurance Co.
131 So. 2d 46
La. 1961
Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
South Street Lumber Company v. Dickerson
106 So. 2d 513
La. 1958
Likewise in Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
Normann v. Burnham's Van Service
73 So. 2d 640
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
In Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
Martin-Owsley, Inc. v. Philip Freitag, Inc.
12 So. 2d 270
La. 1943
304 ; Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
Roper v. Brooks
9 So. 2d 485
La. 1942
For instance, in the case of Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
Loeb v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.
154 So. 453
La. 1934
And such, in effect, , 95 So.
-
Poulan v. Gallagher
147 So. 723
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1933
That no such absurd result was intended is clearly shown by section 3 of the Act of 1928, which is as follows: “Be it further enacted that nothing in this Act shall be construed as affecting other methods of process against non-residents as now provided by existing laws.” Defendant, in his motion to dissolve, relies upon the case of Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
W. H. Hodges & Co. v. Pennsylvania R.
132 So. 115
La. 1930
Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
- W.H. Hodges Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 132 So. 115 La. 1930
-
Overruled
United Oil & Natural Gas Products Corp. v. United Carbon Co.
131 So. 52
La. 1930
739; Burgin Bros. & , 95 So.
-
Palmer v. Avalon Oil Co.
120 So. 781
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
By the express tefms of Article 240 of the Code of Practice, a creditor may obtain an attachment “when such debtor resides out of the State,” and in suits in rem, such as this was, the attachment “was the very foundation of the suit and stands in the place of the citation required in ordinary proceedings.” Burgin Bros. & McCane vs. Barker Baking Co., , 95 So.
-
Fullilove v. Central State Bank
107 So. 590
La. 1926
This appears from the ruling made in Burgin Bros. & , 152 La.