Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Johnson, 92 So. 139.
- State v. Franklin 520 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
State v. Willie
410 So. 2d 1019
La. 1982
[1] For an earlier discussion by this court of improper prosecutorial reference to the possibility of gubernatorial pardons in capital cases, , 92 So.
- State v. Dupre 408 So. 2d 1229 La. 1982
- State v. Hamilton 334 So. 2d 383 La. 1976
- State v. Bryant 325 So. 2d 255 La. 1976
- State v. Sylvester 298 So. 2d 807 La. 1974
- State v. Eubanks 94 So. 2d 262 La. 1957
-
Overruled
State v. Burks
199 So. 220
La. 1940
*377 said: “I am going to ask the Judge to charge you about the law here about pardon and commutation of sentence and that the average term served by prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment is not more than ten years.” This, he contends, , 92 So.
-
State v. Henry
198 So. 910
La. 1940
arks.” Article 381 of the Code of Criminal Procedure reads, as follows: “Counsel may argue to the jury both the law and the evidence of the case, but must confine themselves to matters as to which evidence has been received, or of which judicial cognizance is taken, and to the law applicable to the evidence; and counsel shall refrain from any appeal to prejudice.” , 92 So.
- State v. Wall 180 So. 476 La. 1938
- Germalene Chemical Co. v. Virginia Hotel Co. 157 So. 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1934
- State v. West 139 So. 304 La. 1932
- State v. West 139 So. 304 La. 1932
- State v. Cattana 136 So. 299 La. 1931
- State v. Scruggs 116 So. 206 La. 1928
- State v. Cole 109 So. 505 La. 1926
-
State v. Dunn
109 So. 56
La. 1926
The trial judge says in his per curiam that he, “Eustice Dunn, was the only available witness who could apparently establish the whereabouts of his brother Byron.” , 92 So.
- State v. Barker 106 So. 295 La. 1925
-
State v. Foster
101 So. 255
La. 1924
Const. 1921, § 10, art. 7; , 92 South.