DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Desselles, 90 So. 773.

18 citing documents.

  • State v. Green 269 So. 2d 460 La. 1972
    494 , (1922); State v. Comeaux, 142 La.
  • State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
  • State v. Clayton 110 So. 2d 111 La. 1959
    494 , , thusly: “A court or jury having jurisdiction to try the defendant for the crime charged in a bill of indictment or information has jurisdiction to convict him of a less serious crime, of which, if charged alone, the court or jury would not have jurisdiction; provided, of course, all of the elements of the less
  • State v. Poe 38 So. 2d 359 La. 1948
    494 , , from which we quoted with approval in the Roberts case.
  • State v. Roberts 35 So. 2d 216 La. 1948
    494 , , thus: “A court or jury having jurisdiction to try the defendant for the crime charged in a bill of indictment or information has jurisdiction to convict him of a less serious crime, of which, if charged alone, the court or jury would not have jurisdiction; provided, of course, all of the elements of the less se
  • State v. Stanford 15 So. 2d 817 La. 1943
    494 , ; and State v. Flattmann, 172 La.
  • State v. Guillot 9 So. 2d 235 La. 1942
    494 , , which is the leading case on the subject, this court reviewed the jurisprudence and held that in a case such as this the indictment was one for burglary and not for larceny.
  • State v. Seal 143 So. 18 La. 1932
  • State v. Seal 143 So. 18 La. 1932
  • State v. Ritchie 136 So. 11 La. 1931
    494 , ; State v. O’Banion, 171 La.
  • State v. Flattmann 135 So. 3 La. 1931
    494 , ; State v. Hataway, 153 La.
  • State v. Jacques 132 So. 657 La. 1931
    494 , ; State v. Bailey, 154 La.
  • State v. Hill 130 So. 865 La. 1930
    494 , ; State v. Bailey, 154 La.
  • State v. O'Banion 131 So. 34 La. 1930
  • State v. Hackett 117 So. 141 La. 1928
  • State v. Fradella 111 So. 423 La. 1927
    494 , ; State v. Hataway, 153 La.
  • State v. Dunn 109 So. 56 La. 1926
  • State v. Doty 104 So. 736 La. 1925
    510 , , wherein we said: “It appears that the box had been opened by the clerk of court for the trial of a case that preceded this case, and that some names had therefore been drawn, from the box.