Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pugh v. Flannery, 92 So. 699.
- Newton v. Inter-American, Inc. 209 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
- Eden v. Johnson 176 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
- South Street Lumber Company v. Dickerson 106 So. 2d 513 La. 1958
-
Babers v. Jolly
107 So. 2d 81
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
929 ; Pugh v. Flannery, 1922, , 92 So.
-
Williams v. Ralph S. Miller Shows
5 So. 2d 135
La. 1941
447; Pugh v. *878 Flannery, , 92 So.
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Vicksburg v. Drexler 171 So. 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Hope v. Gordon 173 So. 177 La. 1936
- Inter City Express Lines, Inc. v. Guarisco 165 So. 727 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1936
- Superior Oil Co. v. Baltar 160 So. 626 La. 1935
- Self v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 151 So. 193 La. 1933
- Collins v. McCook 136 So. 204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1931
- Charles B. Nelsen & Co. v. Rodriguez 133 So. 347 La. 1931
-
Devant v. Pecou
128 So. 700
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1930
Pugh vs. Flannery, , 92 So.
-
Nelson v. Coppage
128 So. 529
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
“In the absence of personal service against a non-resident, to vest the court with jurisdiction, there must be property of the non-resident within its territorial jurisdiction, and such property must be validly seized or levied upon under process issued by the court.” Pugh vs. Flannery et al., , 92 So.
-
Smith v. Wilson
128 So. 682
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1930
Pugh vs. Flannery, , 92 So.
- Bass v. Baskowitz 129 So. 201 La. 1930
-
Wright v. Melder
125 So. 765
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1930
“Non-residents can not be brought into Courts of Louisiana on ordinary demands for money by substituted service.” (See numerous authorities cited under Art. 254, Marr’s Revised Code of Practice, 1927, and especially Pugh et al. vs. Flannery et al., , 92 South.
-
Smith v. Wilson
125 So. 302
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
447 ; Pugh vs. Flannery, , 92 So.
-
Tatum v. McWilliams
7 La. App. 91
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1927
“In the absence of personal service against a non-resident, to vest a court with jurisdiction, two conditions 'must concur: (1) There must be property of the nonresident in the territorial jurisdiction of the court; and (2) the property must be validly seized or levied upon under process issued by the court.” Pugh vs. Flannery, ; 92 South.
-
Parry v. Cox
4 La. App. 238
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1926
These formalities stand in the place of citation served on the defendant, and must be strictly complied with.” And in Pugh vs. Flannery, , 92 South.